Home

 

Join Our Chapter

 

Join National PDA

 

Upcoming Meetings and Events

 

About PDA  Metro San Diego 

 

Photo Album

 

Links

 

Contact 

 

 

Upcoming Events

_______________________________________________________________________________

 

 

PDA METRO MEETING 


when:     Thursday, June 17,  6 pm supper, 7 pm meeting

where:        Giovanni's Pizza, corner 9353 Clairemont  
                    Mesa Blvd (at R
uffin Rd.)

                 An Invitation to our Esteemed 
                       Endorsed Candidates


   "OK, the Primary's over -
NOW COME HOME!"

This will be a "down home" meeting, suits left in the closet, hair down, Congratulations, fun music, conversation, crying in beer as needed.

We will have some Announcements (when don't we?), and brief discussion of Blackwater's recent Court decision followed by the June 12 protest.

Our Nationally (and Locally) Endorsed Candidates:    

Cheryl Ede (CA 50)

Vickie Butcher (CA 52)

Mike Copass (CA 53)
                  

Our Locally Endorsed Candidates:

Floyd Morrow (Mayor of San Diego)

Stephen Whitburn (SD Council District 3)

Rudy Reyes (SD County Board of Supervisors)

Welcome home to PDA Metro and on to greater things.

 

_______________________________________________

PDA METRO MEETING 


when:     Thursday, May 15 6 pm supper, 7 pm meeting

where:        Giovanni's Pizza, corner Clairemont  
                    Mesa Blvd and R
uffin Rd.

PDA Metro San Diego Chapter welcomes you to a very special evening this Thursday
for two important reasons.

We recommend that you arrive early for good seating.

Col. Ann Wright, US Army (Ret),
and US diplomat, who resigned her position in Afghanistan to protest the upcoming Iraq War 
will speak and sign her new book, "Dissent: Voices of Conscience". Col. Wright's book will be 
available for purchase.

Col. Wright is returning from Japan, and will report on new developments in President Bush's 
efforts to have the Japanese amend their Constitution to participate in the US War of 
Aggression in Iraq. She will also report on the cover-up of assault, rape and murder of US 
female military by male counterparts, and the assault and rape of women on Okinawa by 
US service personnel. 

Nationally Endorsed Candidates

This Thursday night is also our last meeting with our 3 nationally endorsed candidates as 
Primary Candidates. Yes, the next time we hear from them, they will be the Democratic 
Candidates running in the General Election to represent us in the House of Representatives. 
Please join us to welcome them once more, and to give them a great send-off to their Primaries June 3rd. We will join together to help them be elected. Details at the meeting. 

Our Candidates:

Mike Copass - CA 53
Cheryl Ede - CA 50

Vickie Butcher - CA 52

We urge you to support these deserving Candidates.
See you Thursday!

_____________________________________________

PDA METRO MEETING 


when:     Thursday, April 17 6 pm supper, 7 pm meeting

where:        Giovanni's Pizza, corner Clairemont  
                    Mesa Blvd and R
uffin Rd.

 

First, remember to go to your caucus Sunday - PDA Metro Members are running as 
delegates to the Democratic National Convention in Denver. See Dr. Bill's email with 
the list of PDA Candidates.

                                    JOIN US 
             Meet your Democratic Candidate for 
                              Mayor of San Diego 

                                Floyd Morrow


Floyd will discuss his campaign and his plans to restore confidence in government, to restore fiscal 
responsibility in City Hall, and to fulfill the promise of San Diego as America's Finest City - Floyd 
will ask for a "friendly endorsement"


                                          AND 
Since PETRAEUS And CROCKER sent us a 
CLEAR MESSAGE for the Administration:

                                
!!! ATTACK IRAN !!!
                                          AND 
Since the media has embraced this new war,
We bring you excerpts of the Movie, based on 
Norman Solomon's book, 

                                 
WAR MADE EASY
How Presidents & Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death 

narrated by Sean Penn, and featuring Norman Solomon - 
PDA's own Norman Solomon 
(co-chair of Healthcare not Warfare Initiative)
We've invited Norman to call in, discuss the current push 
for an attack on Iran, and take your questions. 
Also - more on working precincts and monitoring elections!

_____________________________________________

                     PDA Metro Meeting:

When:     Thursday, Mar. 20 6pm supper/ 7pm meeting

Where:    Giovanni's Pizza (corner Clairemont Mesa Blvd 
                          and Ruffin Rd. San Diego) 

What:      Did you know?

That San Diego County's Elections are run by:

Former Diebold Sales Executive (Registrar, Deborah Seiler)

Former Cuyahoga County Ohio Registrar, two members of whose
staff were convicted in the
2004 Ohio Presidential Election Scandal? (Assistant Registrar, Michael Vu)

How to elect Progressive Democrats and take back our country? 

Come to our meeting to find out!

Hear Julian Quinonez (SD Co. Dem Party) discuss the Go Team 
efforts - and how to become a Precinct Leader and Poll Watcher - help progressive candidates get elected.

Hear  Sal Magallanez on working Election Integrity by poll watching 

We got Blackwater out - we can fix our elections and get a 
Progressive Democratic Majority in - Si se puede!

_________________________________________________________________________________________

  
  
PDA Metro Endorses and will Participate in
           
SDCPJ's March 15 Rally and March 
                      
commemorating 
     the Illegal Invasion of Iraq
 Mar. 19, 2003
              The occupation continues...     

          Join us at our PDA Metro Table 

     
                11:15 at TerAlta Park

                  (bordered by 40th St, Orange Ave, Central Ave and Polk St)     

 We'll assemble there to go to the March together 
                and march behind our banner.  

        
Bring signs, drums (substitute pots and wooden spoons)
               and wear your PDA T Shirt to demonstrate 
                   our solidarity in opposing this war!

           March will return to TerAlta Park for 1 pm Rally with
 

                       
    Featured Speaker, Gore Vidal 

Directions to TerAlta Park  
 

TerAlta is either directly below or above I-15 - hard to be sure from the map.

If you get off I-15 North at El Cajon Blvd. (highly recommended) go West (left) on El Cajon Blvd, and almost immediately go South (left) on 40th. Orange Ave. is 1 block south of El Cajon Blvd. Turn left on Orange to drive the northern border of the park and then you can circle it to find parking. 

If you're coming from 15-South, go west (right) on El Cajon Blvd and then follow the above directions.

____________________________________________
    
PDA Metro San Diego Proudly Presents:

                   !!!  ENDORSED CANDIDATES  !!!

CA 53

                           MIKE COPASS

               Click on Mike's picture to see his story on the 
                              National Website                 

 

CA 50     

                            CHERYL EDE

 

                        And Presenting Our First 

                           Nationally Endorsed 

                          Candidate this year, in 

CA 52
                                 VICKIE BUTCHER
 See Vickie's Front Page Story at PDA National:

 http://www.pdamerica.org/articles/campaigns/2008-03-03-13-06-01-campaigns.php

     Information:  All 3 Candidates have won the Endorsement of our Chapter.   To 
     receive the National Endorsement, the Candidates
participate in the National 
     Conference Call, "Inside the Democratic Party", the 4th Thursday of each month.      
      

       Candidate Vickie Butcher has won the National Endorsement in last month's call.

      Mike Copass and Cheryl Ede will be on the call Thursday, March 27.   All PDA    
      members are invited to be on the call.   See the National Home page for call 
      information.

                           ___________________________________________
       Candidate Endorsement Meeting
Feb. 29

       Hear Mike Copass for Congress in CA 53

              Giovanni's at 6pm Supper - 6:30 pm Registration - 7:00 pm Meeting 

               Here are Mike's Responses!

                    CA 53

                                                      PDA Metro San Diego Chapter

                                            
2008 Candidate Endorsement Questionnaire

                                                      U. S. House of Representatives

Return to:

Judy Hess, Leader                  j.hess@cox.net
Diane Shamis, PDA                diane@pdamerica.org

  Please fill out this form if you are interested in pursuing an endorsement by PDA Metro San Diego . We are part of Progressive Democrats of America , a nationwide grassroots organization of 100,000 members that works inside the Democratic Party and outside in movements for peace and justice.

  Please return this questionnaire by the Deadline:       Feb. 22 2008

  Altering or deleting the questions on this form may lead to disqualification.  Please note that your answers on this questionnaire may be made public.  Please answer on this form in the space below the question.  Use as much space as you need. Feel free to change font and/or color to distinguish your answers.

  If you have any questions regarding this questionnaire, please contact Judy Hess, 619-421-6403.

                                     Candidate and Campaign Information:

Candidate Name: Mike Copass

Address:  4042 Mount Blackburn Ave

City, State, Zip: San Diego CA 92111

E-mail Address:  California53@gmail.com

Office for which you are running:  US Congress, 53rd District, California

Date of Election:  June 3, 2008

Registered Political Party: Democratic Party

Campaign Manager              N/A

Phone: 619.665.9415        Fax: N/A

Campaign Consultant:     N/A Phone:    N/A                   Fax: N/A

Campaign Address:  Copass for Congress, PO Box 125081 , San Diego CA 92112-0581

List endorsements from organizations and/or individuals:

Al Meyerhoff   (Environmental lawyer and former Natural Resources Defense Council attorney) 

I have only recently begun asking for endorsements. 

How would you describe yourself politically (i.e. progressive; moderate democrat, etc.)?

I am a proud Progressive. 
To quote the late Senator Paul Wellstone “
I stand for the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party”

List elective or political party offices you have held, including committee appointments:

None. 
(In addition, I have been neither wined, nor dined, by a lobbyist or PAC, nor taken paid-for travel.)

What is your primary occupation?

I am a scientific consultant to a plaintiffs’ law firm, specializing in detecting and prosecuting securities 
fraud perpetrated by pharmaceutical manufacturers alleged to have violated Securities laws.  I created 
and am the president of a legal services business which hires and trains attorneys in the review and 
analysis of discovery documents in similar complex civil litigation matters.   Additionally, I write for the Corporate Governance Bulletin, a quarterly publication which highlights litigation and advances in 
securities and consumer fraud.

Why are you running for Congress? (100 word limit)

I strongly believe that the United States must face multiple impending financial, ecological, political 
social crises, driven by a war machine and militarism that has been vocally opposed by We, the People, 
but yet unchallenged by the people's Congress. It is abundantly clear that the status quo (and the 
incumbent representative in our District) has failed utterly to provide leadership in confronting these 
crises.  Americans can, and will, boldly confront these challenges – and to do so, the times call for change – for a new approach and with a new voice.

Issues Specific to Office:

What experiences have prepared you to run for Congress?

Patience:  I have 12 years of experience in molecular biology, specifically microbiology and molecular genetics, working in three different countries, which has provided training in patience, persistence, (and languages) as well as providing an understanding of genetic technologies. There are currently no members 
of Congress with training in molecular biology, which is alarming, given the rapid technological 
development and genetically modified products entering our food supply.

Business:  I manage a small business in Legal Services, which has been instrumental in instructing me 
how job creation, business, and regulation function.

Activism: I have served as a volunteer Point Person in the 53rd Congressional District ( San Diego ) since June, in which I brought the concerns of the progressive community to the office of its Congressional Representative. My candidacy arises directly out of my experience with PDA, in pursuing a meaningful "inside and outside the Party" strategy for change. I took my role as point person seriously, reading and studying the various House Resolutions under consideration, and communicating the Representative's 
votes and positions on key issues ( Iraq , impeachment, and healthcare) back to the members of PDA.

If you receive the endorsement of Progressive Democrats of America , how do you intend to use it?

A PDA endorsement will be invaluable to establishing awareness and excitement about a new 
Progressive candidate on both a local national level.  I will employ the PDA endorsement in a fashion 
similar to that of Donna Edwards of Maryland , to reach out to other progressive political groups both 
locally and nation-wide, and be proud to list the endorsement on my literature, website and 
communications.

Please list the top three issues on which you will take leadership if elected:

1) Ending Iraq war funding and returning troops home with full proper treatment. I support the Lynn Woolsey-sponsored HR 508, the Bring the Troops home and Iraq Sovereignty Restoration, towards 
restoring the United States ’ standing in the world community.

2) Aggressively moving to address global climate change, through integrating sound and sustainable 
energy policy with carbon and climate policy, for both short term and long term goals.

3) Implementing Universal Health Care in the United States (I support HR 676, cosponsored by John Conyers and Dennis Kucinich)

Do you agree with Congress’ decision to reauthorize the Patriot Act?

No.   We know now Patriot Act was a terrible idea, born of the twin evils of fear and deception, and based neither in facts nor reflection.  

As a matter of principle, I oppose strongly all legislation that undermines or eviscerates our Constitutional rights -- from the Patriot Act, to the creating of the Homeland Security Dept, the Military Commission 
Act, which suspends habeas corpus, and the attempts to pass “Patriot Act II.”  The net effect of these 
laws is not “better security” -- the Patriot Act and its ill-conceived brethren instead exert an enormously chilling effect on free and open speech, and the ability of American citizens to actively voice their dissent.

I stand with Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul, who, although of starkly differing positions on social programs, have stood up and spoken out-- with purpose and clarity --against the raft of "anti-
freedom" legislations passed by Congress during the last seven years, laws which are antithetical to the basic freedoms and liberties which generations of men and women fought to establish.  The newest 
outrage is the revelation that Bush-Cheney have sought, even prior to September 11th 2001, the circumvention of the FISA court standard, to harvest all electronic communications, voice and data, from American citizens engaged in private discourse – this with the collaboration of the large telecom 
corporations.

The lifeblood of liberty is free and open discourse: in the street, on the phone, on the internet.  Legislation that chills or suppresses this speech, or that permits spying either overtly or covertly, eviscerates the 
privacy protections of the 4th Amendment.

In Congress, I will support legislation such as HR 3835, cosponsored by Kucinich and Welch, which addresses and repeals many of the abuses of executive power.

Why or why not?

See details above.

If elected, which committee(s) would you prefer to serve on and why?

The House Armed Services Committee, in order support the human personnel serving in the armed forces in the mission of defense of the continental United States, and to place a strong check on the interests that would attempt to manipulate and abuse the awesome military power of the United States to purposes that are inimical to freedom – whether for purposes of empire-building, or to expand for-profit oil enterprises. We have learned the lessons of Col Medley Butler, who said (in 1933) "There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket."  Having been alerted by our returning US military veterans regarding the incredible 
abuses of the Iraq invasion, we must stay ever-vigilant against the use of the Armed Services for "war as 
a racket." The restoration and rebuilding of the human infrastructure of the men and women is our obligation.  As such, I would be honored to be called to serve on the Oversight Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee (HASC).


As a scientist who is keenly aware of the importance of scientific data, and who has direct experience as a genetic engineer, and fully aware of both the incredible power for genetic technology to be abused for private-profit purposes,  I would also be pleased to rise to the call to serve on the Agricultural Committee.  The use, sale and consumption of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO foods) is a topic that should be part of a lively and informed public debate.

I would similarly be glad to serve on the newly-established House Select Committee on Energy 
Independence and Global Warming.

Federal Issues:

1) Iraq :

PDA supports an immediate start to a rapid and complete withdrawal from Iraq of all troops and military contractors, and has championed legislation that would withhold funding for any other military purpose there. In addition, PDA believes that the U.S. must revise its strategy for the region by removing these forces from the Mideast entirely, rather than just "redeploying" them within the region.  PDA advocates a shift in U.S. foreign policy from reckless unilateralism toward cooperation and diplomacy--so that people of other countries know us more by our helping hand than our slugging arm. Furthermore, PDA supports the redirecting of resources allocated for military spending to human needs. 

Will you pledge to support such immediate and total withdrawal from Iraq of the military forces, including supporting legislation towards this goal?

A priority for the 111th Congress must be the restoration of America ’s standing in the world community.  America ’s strength lies not in its weaponry, but in the power of its ideals.  To that end, I fully support legislation such as HR 508, Lynn Woolsey’s “Iraq Sovereignty Restoration” Bill. The international community can and will come together to 
support the peaceful reconstruction of the nation of Iraq, and I will support legislation those ends, while we 
reconstruct our human military infrastructure both at home and abroad by providing the services they may need.

  In addition, will you forswear any preemptive military attacks upon any nation?

I believe in Rule by Law.

The framers of the Constitution understood that placing the power of unilateral use of the military in the hands of one man, or in the Executive Branch, was to invite the abuse of that power. Therefore, Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution describes that it is reserved to the Congress, and only to Congress, the power to declare war and levy funds for that purpose.
Pre-emptive military strikes fall dangerously close to what the U.S. itself defined at Nuremburg as Crimes against Peace, or War Crimes.

Will you commit to fully support investigations into the White House's false claims justifying the invasion 
of Iraq, and would you support impeachment of Bush, Cheney and other administration officials for these 
and other high crimes?

I believe in Rule by Law. No one is unaccountable, or above the law.

Congress' failure to uphold the rule of law, to uphold its sworn oath, is a danger to the rule of Law. The founders and framers of the Constitution could foresee a need for Congressional oversight and accountability, and saw fit to discuss impeachment in six places in that document. (Curiously, "corporation" appears nowhere.)

I would support investigations to the actions of any government officials, whether in foreign countries, or 
my own, which may constitute War Crimes, or at the least, the fraud perpetrated and described in the book " USA v. George W Bush" by Elizabeth de la Vega .  If investigations proved to be grounds for 
impeachment of either President Bush, or Vice President, it is Congress' obligation pursue the.  It is 
appalling that throughout two full Congressional sessions, particularly after the November 2006 election's majority went to the Democrats that many members of Congress have failed to support HR 333, which I would do, if in office.

Have you participated in or spoken at any events, demonstrations, meetings or teach-ins opposing the Iraq war and occupation?

Yes. I have participated in a number of anti-war and impeachment demonstrations on the street.

Have you organized any such events?

I am organizing 24 (or 48) hour anti-war vigil in downtown San Diego , in solidarity with Iraq Veterans 
Against the War and their Winter Soldier events, March 14-15.

2) Health Care:

There are over 46 million uninsured people living in America , the majority of who are working Americans. Every year, nearly 18,000 people die unnecessarily as a direct result of their lack of health insurance.  Millions with health insurance maintain inadequate, overly expensive coverage and face the peril of denials of claims or termination of benefits if a family member becomes seriously ill--one of the leading causes of bankruptcy in the U.S.    While spending twice as much on health care as any other industrialized country, 
our system performs poorly, spending more money for less coverage, maximizing profits by finding ways to deny care. The private insurance bureaucracy expends one-third of health care money on waste, administrative paperwork, advertising and corporate profits. The current Medicare program for senior citizens spends under 4% of its budget for its overhead costs. Meanwhile, poor health, escalating health insurance premiums and spiraling health care costs impair our economy and job creation in the U.S.

  PDA has endorsed HR 676, the National Health /"Expanded and Improved Medicare for-All" Act. To guarantee comprehensive health care for all, PDA supports the replacement of the current profit-driven system, publicly financed, privately provided health care program. This "Medicare for All" national plan would save more than $350 billion per year, enough new money to provide guaranteed comprehensive 
health care for all. This system would insure portable and uniform benefits regardless of income. With no deductibles or co-pays, this plan would encourage preventive care and restore a doctor and patient 
controlled health care system affording choice of providers and fair, publicly negotiated payment for both treatment and medication.

  What is your approach to the health care crisis?

I believe that without access to health care, we cannot reasonably practice the pursuit of "life, liberty and happiness" – as exhorted to in the Declaration of Independence.  It is a moral outrage that the United 
States
has 46 million who are without access to healthcare, and approximately 100 million who are un- or inadequately covered.

We are all the stakeholders in the Public Health. I would support legislation similar to HR 676, the Conyers-Kucinich bill, the system endorsed by more than 14,000 physicians. 

What is your view of Guaranteed Health Care through an Expanded and Improved Medicare-for-All 
system?

See above. If France can put together a functioning healthcare system for its population, there is no 
reason that the United States cannot.

There will be certain parties who will howl in anger at such a system, best illustrated by CEOs such as UnitedHealthcare's William McGuire, who, after years in the private sector of healthcare, then attempted 
to retire with $1.3 billion in gains, and Pfizer's former CEO Hank McKinnell, former BusinessRoundTable Chairman, who, after pushing pharmaceuticals on the market that medical plans neither needed nor could afford, stepped down with $240 million in options.  A for-profit system tends to fall victim to being rigged 
in the interests of a self-serving elite.  These enormous healthcare and Pharma CEO payouts illustrate at 
a glance that for-profit systems are difficult to harness to the public good.

If elected, would you support a publicly financed, privately provided national health care program, which insures access to comprehensive health care for all in the U.S. ?

Yes. Americans deserve access to at least a minimum of health care, particularly preventive care. I have worked with type II diabetics and am very concerned about the epidemics of diabetes, obesity, 
hypertension, and cardiac disease which are lurking like time bombs in our population.  As the son of a physician who works in a County Hospital , we often do not realize that failure to treat and intervene early 
is not a "savings" but rather a cost, a tax that must be paid elsewhere.

Would you support a not-for-profit, doctor-patient controlled system which would eliminate the private health insurance industry (with protection for eliminated workers) as the intermediary determining access and the level of care?

Yes, substantially.  When we create a profit-center out of denying care to those who need it, to feed the corporate insurance sector's requirement to "make its numbers" on profit margins each year, we sow the seeds of disaster.  It is care-givers and patients that have the vested interest in promoting long-term public health – and that "health and wellness" is to the public profit – measured in moral terms, not in Wall 
Street's dollar-only metric.

Would you support the government's ability to negotiate fair prices for treatment as well as drugs, as it 
does for those covered by the Veteran's Administration's plan?

Yes. I furthermore would support intensive engagement of the FDA in its mission not to rubber-stamp Big Pharma's latest new drugs, but to determine efficacy and safety. Our government is useless if it does not protect the public from such harms as the recent phen-fen and Vioxx debacles. My work in analyzing 
clinical trials data from big-Pharma sponsored drug trials (both the published and often-hidden data) has 
been invaluable.

3) Economic Justice:

The current generation has seen unprecedented levels of economic disparity, both among individuals (the richest 1% of Americans own almost 35% of all wealth; the bottom half, only 2.5%) and in the ratio of 
CEO pay to employee wages. Thirty-seven million people (equal to the population of California ) are living 
in poverty in the U.S. These immoral levels of poverty, which disproportionately impact communities of 
color and women, can be significantly reduced through concerned legislative effort - including a living wage for all workers, expanded earned income tax credits, childcare assistance and housing vouchers.  
Specifically, the federal government must fulfill its promise of resources to Hurricane Katrina survivors so they can return to rebuild their communities in the Gulf Coast .

 

Tax burdens on the middle class can be eased if the wealthy pay their share. In addition to working to roll back Bush's tax breaks for the wealthy, PDA endorses the Equity in Income Act, limiting the amount of 
CEO compensation afforded federal corporate tax deductions.  In emphatically supporting the workers' 
right to organize, we also endorse the Employee Free Choice Act, which establishes unions in any 
workplace where a majority of workers sign union cards to join.  In the global arena, PDA supports anti-sweatshop legislation and fair trade agreements which protect workers' rights as well as the environment, while opposing wage reducing "free trade" agreements that protect only corporate rights to exploit unprotected labor.  PDA also advocates for humane and comprehensive immigration reform, which insures a fair, attainable path to citizenship and the rights of undocumented workers in the workplace, affirming the dignity and integrity of immigrant families.

What is your position on "Fair Trade" versus "Free Trade" agreements?

"Free Trade" agreements often prove to be neither Free nor substantially about furthering true Trade, rather a rigging of the system to the benefit of the few, and detriment of many.   If 12 years of NAFTA 
have not shown anything else, the ability of US Corn to dump a subsidized product on Central American markets has the net effect of driving Central American growers (many smallholders) off their own land, 
into the ranks of urban poor, and finally, to desperate migrations to other countries.

This massive migration pressure is felt first in border areas including San Diego County .  NAFTA and its 
ilk (such as the recent Peru-CAFTA) have failed all parties.  I am strongly supportive of fair wages being paid on both sides of the border, and to these ends, trade agreements not by supra-national bodies such as the WTO, but from representation of workers and the citizens, are of utmost importance to all.

Will you have pledge to reverse the tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans?

I pledge to restore tax fairness, and to do this, the repeal of the economically-disastrous Bush tax cuts is essential -- (Even conservative Alan Greenspan, former head of the Federal Reserve, insists on that point.)

Having already thought about the matter, I would support a “Tobin Tax” on financial derivative transactions (the outstanding notional amount is roughly $516 trillion) of about 0.5% to 1%.  Congress must act now to restore fairness, such that Wall Street transactions of billions and trillions are taxed in a fashion not 
creating unfairness to the laboring man and woman.

Do you support the right of workers to organize, in any situation?

I support the right of workers to organize, to discuss organization, and if a majority agree to form a labor organization, then management should immediately begin a formal process that acknowledges and formally recognizes this process, while creating protections for workers who wish to organize.

What is your relationship to labor nationally and in your district?

I am in support of Organized Labor, nationally –and I believe that to be pro-Labor is to be pro-Family and furthermore pro-strong American Middle Class. A strong an engaged middle class is a bulwark of liberty, and of the "domestic tranquility" referred to in the Constitution.   I work on behalf of a plaintiffs’ firm which represents Union clients in securities fraud class-action suits, when union pension funds have been 
defrauded -- these unions include SEIU, UNITE-HERE, and others.

Do you have union endorsements and supporters in your district?

I have no union endorsements at this time. I will seek the endorsement of particular labor unions in the 
53rd District.

What is your approach to bringing communities "out of poverty"?

1)      Recognize the root causes of the poverty cycle in a specific community,  and address them with long-range programs

2)      Business incentive and job creation: most communities on borderline poverty are ready and willing 
to work. They lack the job training & access to capital -- which the wealthy often enjoy as a matter 
of birthright.

3)      Homeownership & foreclosure:  I support public & private partnerships in the community which assist at-risk homeowners who face late payment or mortgage default. The 2/28 and 3/27 ARM mortgages (called “subprime”) often result in rapidly increasing “balloon payments.” Default leads to foreclosure leads to neighborhood decay I support neighborhood which assist at-risk homeowners from predatory lending, and can save homeowners from foreclosure – programs in Chicago have 
been incredibly successful in this regard.

Would you support the legislation of the "out of poverty" caucus?

Yes. Poverty is an issue addressed through equitable and mandatory education standards, through investment in human capital across the country, and requires equitable taxation and healthcare support to achieve the goal. We all stand to gain if poverty is addressed honestly, and with moral force.

What efforts would you support to provide meaningful resources to Katrina survivors?

In 2005 and 2006, the United States government missed, (whether through negligence or by intention)  an incredibly important opportunity in the aftermath of the flooding and destruction of many lower Wards in 
New Orleans– to bring job skills and educational training to the poor communities of the Lower 9th Ward 
and elsewhere. Instead, the Federal Government sent FEMA trailers with toxic formaldehyde.   This does nothing to alleviate either acute or long-term issues.   Out of crisis, opportunity:  New Orleans residents, 
for example, could be right now working with groups like Rebuild Green to construct affordable and environmentally-sound housing in their own neighborhoods, “Green Collar” jobs.  Frequently all we need 
but do is “open the door” – and it is morally appalling that our government does not.

Do you support comprehensive and humane immigration reform as outlined above?

I do. 

Have you reached out to immigrant communities and advocates in your district?

I have established alliances with advocates who work for justice and represent groups of different ethnic identities.

4) Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections:

The U.S. election system is in crisis.  Not only are the usual corrupting factors of money and corporate lobbying as rampant as perhaps at any time in U.S. history, but the new millennium along with the fallout from the contested 2000 election - have ushered in a qualitative change in the conduct of our elections: Centuries of tradition in which citizens, government officials and Party representatives oversaw physical evidence of voter intent have fallen to the rise of the machines. This sea change, from paper to ephemeral electrons, brings much more than the implicit demand to trust the invisible: the move to computers means that 85% of America has ceded control of its elections to third-party vendors, whose legal claims regarding proprietary software bring corporate control of the entire voting process. PDA thus supports federal legislation that would ban the use of touch-screen (“DRE”) voting machines.

Will you pledge, if elected, to support only voting methods in which ballots are cast on paper?

The ballot of record must be defined not as the computer coordinates of the vote record, but the Paper Ballot.  I have been a long time advocate of auditable, verifiable elections, whether via hand-counted paper ballots at the Precinct, or other verifiable, auditable method, consistently employing Paper Ballots. 
I will lead the fight in Congress not for compromise solutions, but for simple and clear legislative reform – and I believe that it is imperative to restore Voter Trust and Confidence in our election systems. The well-documented irregularities of the elections of 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2006 demonstrate that vote suppression, and computerized tabulation, represent "clear and present dangers" to fair, transparent, and open democracy.

Do you pledge to support “Clean Money” public financing of public elections?

Yes.

“Clean Money” is part of important three-part reforms

1) sweeping campaign finance reform  (no bundling, lowered maximum individual contributions, matching public funds)

2) verifiable voting aka “paper ballots” (no computerized tabulation)  

3) fair redistricting, to end gerrymandering of absurd districts which are purely designed to promote incumbency.

All three areas require immediate action.

Would you accept public financing for your current campaign?

Yes – particularly upon demonstrating support within the community for my candidacy.

Do you support the restoration of voting rights to past felony offenders?

Yes. 

Do you support same-day voting registration?

Absolutely.

Would you oppose the onerous requirement of official photo identification before affording citizens access 
to the polls?

I oppose ID requirements at the polls.

Photo and “REAL-ID” requirements are designed to suppress voting among elderly and ethnic groups.

5) Environment/ Global Warming:

No issue reveals more clearly the flaws of the U.S. political-economic system than global warming - the dominance of greed and corporate power over the public good, and the nearsighted focus on the short-term over the welfare of 
future generations.  It is known that the U.S. has the natural resources to power the entire country solely from clean, “alternative” sources of power- whether with solar cells that would require a miniscule fraction of the California 
desert, or from wind turbines on the Great Plains and in the Great Lakes.  It has also often been said that we need a 
new Apollo Program for clean energy (if not Manhattan Project), in which science, industry and government would cooperate on a crash course to produce novel results in a limited period. Immediate action would include raising the 
auto fuel economy and impose mandatory caps on carbon pollution while investing in public transportation, energy conservation technologies and alternative energy development--in the process, creating new jobs, which pay well.

PDA calls on the Democratic majority in Congress to lead boldly in reducing our country's oil dependence and use of fossil fuels.

Will you pledge to take an uncompromising leadership role on legislation to enact the enormous changes 
and sacrifices that will be required to stem Global Warming?

Yes.

I plan to be in the vanguard of this legislation. Although sustainable energy and climate policy is often 
seen as “bad for business”  -- it is more apparent that it is merely “bad for ExxonMobil and Big Oil.”  
There are incredibly exciting job creation possibilities, “green collar” jobs, which we will implement in San Diego County area, and show the rest of the country (and doubters) that the transition to sustainable 
energy solutions will actually drive economic growth.

Will you pledge to enact an Apollo Program for clean energy?

I will fight to enact the “Apollo Alliance ” for renewable and sustainable energy. It all starts with simple 
and useful conservation measures.

What kind of personal vehicle do you currently drive? Is it rated ZEV, or PZEV?

My primary personal transportation is generally a shared carpool.  (I don’t know how that rates on ZEV scale)  My summer & fall transportation is frequently a bicycle, and public transportation for the rest.  During 2007, I challenged myself to reduce personal gasoline consumption by 50%, which I met, as well as 20% reduction in electricity, natural gas, and water.  It proved very possible with creative solutions. In Congress, I will champion national legislation that turns the same practical solutions into public policy.

Local Issue:

Blackwater has initiated the establishment a training camp in Potrero CA .  Congressman Bob Filner has come out in full opposition to this camp. 

 

What will you do specifically to support him in keeping Blackwater out of San Diego County ?

I will Stand Up with Bob Filner. All too frequently, the other Democratic Representative in San Diego  
county fails to stand up and speak out to the moral imperatives of our County, as Democrats, and as 
human beings.

I will fight for legislation, proposed by Filner and others, that bans the use of any land, public or private, for private military contractors (PMCs) such as Blackwater, DynCorp, Kroll, or others.  Private mercenary armies are inimical to freedom, much as Madison and others recognized in the late 1700s.

What is your position on using military contractors in our military actions abroad?

This is a very bad idea. 

The possibility arises that 1) private contractors are hired on a different pay scale, which is unfair to our troops 2) private contractors would be asked to perform task which escape the Geneva Conventions and oversight bodies including Congress and 3) that someday, somewhere, a contingent of private mercenaries might massacre innocent people at an intersection.

If Congress does not act forcefully to assert its oversight authority, such things could someday come to 
pass, and I would predict that the private companies involved would attempt to use some legal loophole to escape accountability.

In our cities, such as New Orleans ?

Strongly opposed.  Blackwater is the for-hire equivalent of the Brownshirts in Germany of the 1930s.

I recall that a for-hire mercenary in New Orleans related this story about encountering, and then gunning down Americans:  [The private security contractor] said he and his men were armed with AR-15s and 
Glocks and that they unleashed a barrage of bullets in the general direction of the alleged shooters on the overpass. "After that, all I heard was moaning and screaming, and the shooting stopped. That was it. 
Enough said."

On our border?

We can decide how to protect, police or defend our borders according to public law, and employing men and women who are accountable to public authorities.

Finance

Please estimate your campaign costs:

Primary Election: $12,000      General Election: $ unknown

How much money have you raised to date?

Approximately $6,200.  I have not yet engaged in directed fundraising, choosing to first work to establish myself as a viable progressive candidate -- and despite the lack of intentional fundraising, money has been donated from points across the political spectrum.  I am grateful and humbled to see this unsolicited outpouring. 

Please list independent expenditures that may impact your race:

My campaign will focus on voter outreach and education, with a large volunteer contingent.  I foresee printing and mailing costs to support my canvassing and field efforts. 

 __________________________________________         

  Candidate Endorsement Meeting Feb. 21 

            Hear the Candidates CA 50 and CA 52

            Giovanni's at 6pm Supper - 6:30 pm Registration - 7:00 pm Meeting 

            Here are the Candidates Responses!

                    CA 50

__________________________________________

Cheryl Ede - 

PDA Metro San Diego Chapter

2008 Endorsement Questionnaire

U. S. House of Representatives

Return to:                                                                     

Judy Hess                    judyhess@gmail.com                                     j.hess@cox.net  and
Diane Shamis              Field@pdamerica.org

  Please fill out this form if you are interested in pursuing an endorsement by PDA Metro San Diego Chapter. 
 
We are part of Progressive Democrats of America, a nation- wide grassroots organization of 100,000 
members that works inside the Democratic Party and outside in movements for peace and justice.

  Please return this questionnaire by the deadline: Feb.14 , 2008.

  Altering or deleting the questions on this form may lead to disqualification.

  Please note that your answers on this questionnaire may be made public. If you need additional space to answer questions, please attach additional pages to the questionnaire.  If you have any questions regarding this questionnaire, please contact judyhess@gmail.com or call 619-421-6403.

 

Candidate and Campaign Information:

 

Candidate Name: Cheryl Martin Ede

  Address:  5210 Harbour Heights Court

  City, State, Zip:  San Diego, CA 92109  

E-mail Address:  cmede@san.rr.com

  Office for which you are running:  Congress – CA 50th district

  Date of Election:  June 3, 2008

  Registered Political Party:  Democratic Party