Aug 1-3:
Chicago PDA National Conference, Report from Judy Hess,
call-to-action items
Grassroots
Organizing and "GO Team" Training at Democratic Party
Office: how to turn good intentions into votes,
and how to elect Progressive Candidates from the bottom of the
ticket on up!
Summer
Recess Congressional office visits in CD 50, 51, 52 & 53
-- PDA priority legislation update, meeting schedule,
contact CD point person
Issue
Organizing Team Reports
Judy
Hess - new developments since Judy gave her powerpoint
presentation on the neocon takeover of the government
-
new revelations on the Iraq document forgeries,
deceptions & investigations
Mike Copass on
developments in Georgia
John Lee Evans for School Board (to be
confirmed)
Special Announcement: PDA will co-host a new voting activism film
"Uncounted: The New Math
of American Elections" Wed, September 24th at 7 pm at the Ultrastar
Cinemas, Hazard Center.
Film Director David Earnhart and Brad Friedman of Bradblog.org will be on
hand. Reception to follow.
See you Thursday,
Aug. 21.
Mike Copass, Leader
PDA Metro San Diego Chapter
_______________________________________________________________________________
PDA METRO MEETING
when:
Thursday,
July 17, 6 pm supper,
7 pm meeting
where:
Giovanni's Pizza, 9353 Clairemont
Mesa Blvd., San Diego (corner
of Ruffin Rd.)
Agenda
Here
_______________________________________________________________________________
PDA
METRO MEETING
when:
Thursday, June 17,
6 pm supper, 7 pm
meeting
where:
Giovanni's Pizza, corner 9353 Clairemont
Mesa Blvd (at Ruffin
Rd.)
An Invitation to our Esteemed
Endorsed Candidates
"OK, the Primary's over - NOW
COME HOME!"
This
will be a "down home" meeting, suits left in the closet, hair
down, Congratulations, fun music, conversation, crying in beer as
needed.
We
will have some Announcements (when don't we?), and brief discussion of
Blackwater's recent Court decision followed by the June 12 protest.
Our
Nationally (and
Locally) Endorsed Candidates:
Cheryl
Ede (CA 50)
Vickie
Butcher (CA 52)
Mike
Copass (CA 53)
Our
Locally Endorsed
Candidates:
Floyd
Morrow (Mayor of San Diego)
Stephen
Whitburn (SD Council District 3)
Rudy
Reyes (SD County Board of Supervisors)
Welcome
home to PDA Metro and on to greater things.
_______________________________________________
PDA
METRO MEETING
when:
Thursday, May 15 6
pm supper, 7 pm meeting
where:
Giovanni's Pizza, corner Clairemont
Mesa Blvd and Ruffin
Rd.
PDA Metro San Diego Chapter welcomes you to a very special evening this Thursday
for two important reasons.
We recommend that you arrive early for good seating.
Col. Ann Wright, US Army (Ret),
and US diplomat, who resigned her position in Afghanistan to protest the upcoming Iraq War
will speak and sign her new book, "Dissent: Voices of Conscience". Col. Wright's book will be
available for purchase.
Col. Wright is returning from Japan, and will report on new developments in President Bush's
efforts to have the Japanese amend their Constitution to participate in the US War of
Aggression in Iraq. She will also report on the cover-up of assault, rape and murder of US
female military by male counterparts, and the assault and rape of women on Okinawa by
US service personnel.
Nationally Endorsed Candidates
This Thursday night is also our last meeting with our 3 nationally endorsed candidates as
Primary Candidates. Yes, the next time we hear from them, they will be the Democratic
Candidates running in the General Election to represent us in the House of Representatives.
Please join us to welcome them once more, and to give them a great send-off to their Primaries June 3rd. We will join together to help them be elected. Details at the meeting.
Our Candidates:
Mike Copass - CA 53
Cheryl Ede - CA 50
Vickie Butcher - CA 52
We urge you to support these deserving Candidates.
See you Thursday!
_____________________________________________
PDA
METRO MEETING
when:
Thursday, April 17 6
pm supper, 7 pm meeting
where:
Giovanni's Pizza, corner Clairemont
Mesa Blvd and Ruffin
Rd.
First, remember to go to your caucus Sunday - PDA Metro Members are running as
delegates to the Democratic National Convention in Denver. See Dr. Bill's email with
the list of PDA Candidates.
JOIN US
Meet your Democratic Candidate for
Mayor of San Diego
Floyd Morrow
Floyd will discuss his campaign and his plans to restore confidence in government, to restore fiscal
responsibility in City Hall, and to fulfill the promise of San Diego as America's Finest City - Floyd
will ask for a "friendly endorsement"
AND
Since PETRAEUS And CROCKER sent us a
CLEAR MESSAGE for the Administration:
!!! ATTACK IRAN !!!
AND
Since the media has embraced this new war,
We bring you excerpts of the Movie, based on
Norman Solomon's book,
WAR MADE EASY
How Presidents & Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death
narrated by Sean Penn, and featuring Norman Solomon -
PDA's own Norman Solomon
(co-chair of Healthcare not Warfare Initiative)
We've invited Norman to call in, discuss the current push
for an attack on Iran, and take your questions.
Also - more on working precincts and monitoring elections!
_____________________________________________
PDA Metro Meeting:
When:
Thursday, Mar. 20 6pm
supper/ 7pm meeting
Where:
Giovanni's Pizza (corner
Clairemont Mesa Blvd
and Ruffin Rd. San Diego)
What:
Did you know?
That
San Diego County's
Elections are run
by:
Former
Diebold Sales Executive
(Registrar, Deborah Seiler)
Former
Cuyahoga County Ohio
Registrar, two members of whose
staff were convicted in the 2004
Ohio Presidential Election Scandal?
(Assistant Registrar, Michael Vu)
How
to elect Progressive Democrats and take back our country?
Come
to our meeting to find out!
Hear
Julian Quinonez
(SD Co. Dem Party) discuss the Go Team
efforts - and how to become a Precinct Leader and Poll Watcher - help
progressive candidates get elected.
Hear
Sal Magallanez
on working Election Integrity by poll watching
We
got Blackwater out - we can
fix our elections and get a
Progressive
Democratic Majority in - Si se puede!
_________________________________________________________________________________________
PDA
Metro Endorses and will Participate in
SDCPJ's
March 15 Rally and March
commemorating
the Illegal Invasion of Iraq Mar.
19, 2003
The occupation
continues...
Join us at our PDA
Metro Table
11:15 at TerAlta
Park
(bordered by 40th St, Orange Ave, Central Ave and Polk St)
We'll
assemble there to
go to the March together
and march behind our banner.
Bring
signs, drums (substitute pots
and wooden spoons)
and wear your PDA T Shirt to demonstrate
our solidarity in opposing this war!
March will return to TerAlta Park for 1 pm Rally with
Featured Speaker,
Gore Vidal
Directions to
TerAlta Park
TerAlta is either
directly below or above I-15 - hard to be sure from the map.
If
you get off I-15 North at El Cajon Blvd. (highly recommended) go West
(left) on El Cajon Blvd, and almost immediately go South (left) on 40th.
Orange Ave. is 1 block south of El Cajon Blvd. Turn left on Orange to
drive the northern border of the park and then you can circle it to find
parking.
If you're coming from 15-South, go west (right) on El Cajon Blvd and then
follow the above directions.
____________________________________________
PDA
Metro San Diego Proudly Presents:
!!! ENDORSED CANDIDATES !!!
CA 53
MIKE COPASS
Click on Mike's picture to see his
story on the
National Website
CA 50
CHERYL EDE
And Presenting Our First
Nationally Endorsed
Candidate this year, in
CA 52
VICKIE BUTCHER
See Vickie's Front Page Story at PDA National:
http://www.pdamerica.org/articles/campaigns/2008-03-03-13-06-01-campaigns.php
Information: All 3 Candidates have won the Endorsement of our
Chapter. To
receive the National Endorsement, the Candidates
participate in the National
Conference Call, "Inside the Democratic
Party", the 4th Thursday of each month.
Candidate
Vickie Butcher
has won the National Endorsement in last month's call.
Mike Copass and Cheryl
Ede will be on the call Thursday,
March 27. All PDA
members are invited to be on the call.
See the National Home page for call
information.
___________________________________________
Candidate Endorsement Meeting Feb.
29
Hear Mike Copass for
Congress in CA 53
Giovanni's at 6pm Supper -
6:30 pm Registration - 7:00 pm Meeting
Here are Mike's
Responses!
CA 53
PDA
Metro
San Diego
Chapter
2008
Candidate Endorsement Questionnaire
U. S. House of Representatives
Return to:
Judy Hess, Leader
j.hess@cox.net
Diane
Shamis, PDA
diane@pdamerica.org
Please fill out this form if
you are interested in pursuing an endorsement by PDA Metro
San Diego
. We are part of Progressive Democrats of
America
, a nationwide grassroots organization of 100,000 members that works
inside the Democratic Party and outside in movements for peace and
justice.
Please return this questionnaire by the Deadline:
Feb. 22 2008
Altering or deleting the questions on this form may lead to
disqualification. Please note
that your answers on this questionnaire may be made public.
Please answer on this form in the space below the question.
Use as much space as you need. Feel free to change font and/or
color to distinguish your answers.
If you have any questions regarding this questionnaire, please contact
Judy Hess, 619-421-6403.
Candidate
and Campaign Information:
Candidate
Name:
Mike
Copass
Address:
4042 Mount
Blackburn Ave
City,
State, Zip:
San
Diego
CA
92111
E-mail
Address: California53@gmail.com
Office
for which you are running: US
Congress, 53rd District,
California
Date
of Election: June
3, 2008
Registered
Political Party: Democratic
Party
Campaign
Manager:
N/A
Phone:
619.665.9415
Fax: N/A
Campaign
Consultant: N/A
Phone:
N/A
Fax: N/A
Campaign
Address: Copass
for Congress,
PO Box 125081
,
San Diego
CA
92112-0581
List endorsements from organizations and/or individuals:
Al
Meyerhoff (Environmental
lawyer and former Natural Resources Defense Council attorney)
I
have only recently begun asking for endorsements.
How
would you describe yourself politically (i.e. progressive; moderate
democrat, etc.)?
I
am a proud Progressive.
To quote the late Senator Paul Wellstone “I
stand for the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party”
List elective or political party offices you have held, including
committee appointments:
None.
(In addition, I have been neither wined, nor dined, by a lobbyist or PAC,
nor taken paid-for travel.)
What is your primary occupation?
I
am a scientific consultant to a plaintiffs’ law firm, specializing in
detecting and prosecuting securities
fraud perpetrated by pharmaceutical manufacturers alleged to have violated
Securities laws. I created
and am the president of a legal services business which hires and trains
attorneys in the review and
analysis of discovery documents in similar complex civil litigation
matters. Additionally, I
write for the Corporate Governance
Bulletin, a quarterly publication which highlights litigation and
advances in
securities and consumer fraud.
Why are you running for Congress? (100 word limit)
I
strongly believe that the
United States
must face multiple impending financial, ecological, political
social crises, driven by a war machine and militarism that has been
vocally opposed by We, the People,
but yet unchallenged by the people's Congress. It is abundantly clear that
the status quo (and the
incumbent representative in our District) has failed utterly to provide
leadership in confronting these
crises. Americans can, and
will, boldly confront these challenges – and to do so, the times call
for change – for a new approach and with a new voice.
Issues Specific to Office:
What experiences have prepared you to
run for Congress?
Patience:
I have 12 years of experience in molecular biology, specifically
microbiology and molecular genetics, working in three different countries,
which has provided training in patience, persistence, (and languages) as
well as providing an understanding of genetic technologies. There are
currently no members
of Congress with training in molecular biology, which is alarming,
given the rapid technological
development and genetically modified products entering our food supply.
Business:
I manage a small business in Legal Services, which has been
instrumental in instructing me
how job creation, business, and regulation function.
Activism: I have served as a volunteer Point Person in the 53rd
Congressional District (
San Diego
) since June, in which I brought the concerns of the progressive community
to the office of its Congressional Representative. My candidacy arises
directly out of my experience with PDA, in pursuing a meaningful
"inside and outside the Party" strategy for change. I took my
role as point person seriously, reading and studying the various House
Resolutions under consideration, and communicating the Representative's
votes and positions on key issues (
Iraq
, impeachment, and healthcare) back to the members of PDA.
If you receive the endorsement of Progressive Democrats of
America
, how do you intend to use it?
A PDA endorsement will be invaluable
to establishing awareness and excitement about a new
Progressive candidate on both a local national level.
I will employ the PDA endorsement in a fashion
similar to that of Donna Edwards of
Maryland
, to reach out to other progressive political groups both
locally and nation-wide, and be proud to list the endorsement on my
literature, website and
communications.
Please
list the top three issues on which you will take leadership if elected:
1) Ending
Iraq
war funding and returning troops home with full proper treatment. I
support the Lynn Woolsey-sponsored HR 508, the Bring the Troops home and
Iraq Sovereignty Restoration, towards
restoring the
United States
’ standing in the world community.
2) Aggressively moving to address global climate change, through
integrating sound and sustainable
energy policy with carbon and climate policy, for both short term and long
term goals.
3) Implementing Universal Health Care in the
United States
(I support HR 676, cosponsored by John Conyers and Dennis Kucinich)
Do you
agree with Congress’ decision to reauthorize the Patriot Act?
No.
We know now Patriot Act was a terrible idea, born of the twin evils
of fear and deception, and based neither in facts nor reflection.
As
a matter of principle, I oppose strongly all legislation that undermines
or eviscerates our Constitutional rights -- from the Patriot Act, to the
creating of the Homeland Security Dept, the Military Commission
Act, which suspends habeas corpus, and the attempts to pass “Patriot Act
II.” The net effect of these
laws is not “better security” -- the Patriot Act and its ill-conceived
brethren instead exert an enormously chilling effect on free and open
speech, and the ability of American citizens to actively voice their
dissent.
I
stand with Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul, who, although of
starkly differing positions on social programs, have stood up and spoken
out-- with purpose and clarity --against the raft of "anti-
freedom" legislations passed by Congress during the last seven years,
laws which are antithetical to the basic freedoms and liberties which
generations of men and women fought to establish.
The newest
outrage is the revelation that Bush-Cheney have sought, even prior to
September 11th 2001, the circumvention of the FISA court standard, to
harvest all electronic communications, voice and data, from American
citizens engaged in private discourse – this with the collaboration of
the large telecom
corporations.
The
lifeblood of liberty is free and open discourse: in the street, on the
phone, on the internet. Legislation
that chills or suppresses this speech, or that permits spying either
overtly or covertly, eviscerates the
privacy protections of the 4th Amendment.
In Congress, I will support legislation
such as HR 3835, cosponsored by Kucinich and Welch, which addresses and
repeals many of the abuses of executive power.
Why
or why not?
See details above.
If
elected, which committee(s) would you prefer to serve on and why?
The House Armed Services Committee, in
order support the human personnel serving in the armed forces in the
mission of defense of the continental United States, and to place a strong
check on the interests that would attempt to manipulate and abuse the
awesome military power of the United States to purposes that are inimical
to freedom – whether for purposes of empire-building, or to expand
for-profit oil enterprises. We have learned the lessons of Col Medley
Butler, who said (in 1933) "There are only two things we
should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the
Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket."
Having been alerted by our
returning US military veterans regarding the incredible
abuses of the
Iraq
invasion, we must stay ever-vigilant against the use of the Armed Services
for "war as
a racket." The restoration and rebuilding of the human infrastructure
of the men and women is our obligation.
As such, I would be honored to be called to serve on the Oversight
Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee (HASC).
As a scientist who is keenly aware of the importance of scientific data,
and who has direct experience as a genetic engineer, and fully aware of
both the incredible power for genetic technology to be abused for
private-profit purposes, I
would also be pleased to rise to the call to serve on the Agricultural
Committee. The use, sale and
consumption of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO foods) is a topic that
should be part of a lively and informed public debate.
I would similarly be glad to serve on the newly-established House Select
Committee on Energy
Independence and Global Warming.
Federal Issues:
1)
Iraq
:
PDA
supports an immediate start to a rapid and complete withdrawal from
Iraq
of all troops and military contractors, and has championed legislation
that would withhold funding for any other military purpose there. In
addition, PDA believes that the
U.S.
must revise its strategy for the region by removing these forces from the
Mideast
entirely, rather than just "redeploying" them within the region.
PDA advocates a shift in
U.S.
foreign policy from reckless unilateralism toward cooperation and
diplomacy--so that people of other countries know us more by our helping
hand than our slugging arm. Furthermore, PDA supports the redirecting of
resources allocated for military spending to human needs.
Will you pledge to support such immediate and
total withdrawal from
Iraq
of the military forces, including supporting legislation towards this
goal?
A priority for the 111th Congress must be the restoration of
America
’s standing in the world community.
America
’s strength lies not in its weaponry, but in the power of its ideals.
To that end, I fully support legislation such as HR 508, Lynn
Woolsey’s “Iraq Sovereignty Restoration” Bill. The international
community can and will come together to
support the peaceful reconstruction of the nation of Iraq, and I will
support legislation those ends, while we
reconstruct our human military infrastructure both at home and abroad by
providing the services they may need.
In addition, will you forswear any preemptive military attacks upon any
nation?
I believe in Rule by Law.
The
framers of the Constitution understood that placing the power of
unilateral use of the military in the hands of one man, or in the
Executive Branch, was to invite the abuse of that power. Therefore,
Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution describes that it
is reserved to the Congress, and only to Congress, the power to declare
war and levy funds for that purpose.
Pre-emptive military strikes fall dangerously close to what the
U.S.
itself defined at Nuremburg as Crimes against Peace, or War Crimes.
Will you commit to fully support investigations into the White House's
false claims justifying the invasion
of Iraq, and would you support impeachment of Bush, Cheney and other
administration officials for these
and other high crimes?
I believe in Rule by Law. No one is unaccountable, or above the law.
Congress'
failure to uphold the rule of law, to uphold its sworn oath, is a danger
to the rule of Law. The founders and framers of the Constitution could
foresee a need for Congressional oversight and accountability, and saw fit
to discuss impeachment in six places in that document. (Curiously,
"corporation" appears nowhere.)
I
would support investigations to the actions of any government officials,
whether in foreign countries, or
my own, which may constitute War Crimes, or at the least, the fraud
perpetrated and described in the book "
USA
v. George W Bush" by
Elizabeth de la Vega
. If investigations proved to
be grounds for
impeachment of either President Bush, or Vice President, it is Congress'
obligation pursue the. It is
appalling that throughout two full Congressional sessions, particularly
after the November 2006 election's majority went to the Democrats that
many members of Congress have failed to support HR 333, which I would do,
if in office.
Have you participated in or
spoken at any events, demonstrations, meetings or teach-ins opposing the
Iraq
war and occupation?
Yes. I have participated in a number
of anti-war and impeachment demonstrations on the street.
Have you organized any such events?
I am organizing 24 (or 48) hour anti-war vigil in downtown
San Diego
, in solidarity with Iraq Veterans
Against the War and their Winter Soldier events, March 14-15.
2)
Health Care:
There
are over 46 million uninsured people living in
America
, the majority of who are working Americans. Every year, nearly 18,000
people die unnecessarily as a direct result of their lack of health
insurance. Millions with
health insurance maintain inadequate, overly expensive coverage and face
the peril of denials of claims or termination of benefits if a family
member becomes seriously ill--one of the leading causes of bankruptcy in
the
U.S.
While spending twice as
much on health care as any other industrialized country,
our system performs poorly, spending more money for less coverage,
maximizing profits by finding ways to deny care. The private insurance
bureaucracy expends one-third of health care money on waste,
administrative paperwork, advertising and corporate profits. The current
Medicare program for senior citizens spends under 4% of its
budget for its overhead costs. Meanwhile, poor health, escalating health
insurance premiums and spiraling health care costs impair our economy and
job creation in the
U.S.
PDA has endorsed HR 676, the National Health /"Expanded and Improved
Medicare for-All" Act. To guarantee comprehensive health care for
all, PDA supports the replacement of the current profit-driven system,
publicly financed, privately provided health care program. This
"Medicare for All" national plan would save more than $350
billion per year, enough new money to provide guaranteed comprehensive
health care for all. This system would insure portable and uniform
benefits regardless of income. With no deductibles or co-pays, this plan
would encourage preventive care and restore a doctor and patient
controlled health care system affording choice of providers and fair,
publicly negotiated payment for both treatment and medication.
What is your approach to the health care
crisis?
I believe that without access to
health care, we cannot reasonably practice the pursuit of "life,
liberty and happiness" – as exhorted to in the Declaration of
Independence. It is a moral
outrage that the
United
States
has 46 million who are without access to healthcare, and approximately 100
million who are un- or inadequately covered.
We
are all the stakeholders in the Public Health. I would support legislation
similar to HR 676, the Conyers-Kucinich bill, the system endorsed by more
than 14,000 physicians.
What
is your view of Guaranteed Health Care through an Expanded and Improved
Medicare-for-All
system?
See above. If
France
can put together a functioning healthcare system for its population, there
is no
reason that the
United States
cannot.
There will be certain parties who will howl in anger at such a system,
best illustrated by CEOs such as UnitedHealthcare's William McGuire, who,
after years in the private sector of healthcare, then attempted
to retire with $1.3 billion in gains, and Pfizer's former CEO Hank
McKinnell, former BusinessRoundTable Chairman, who, after pushing
pharmaceuticals on the market that medical plans neither needed nor could
afford, stepped down with $240 million in options.
A for-profit system tends to fall victim to being rigged
in the interests of a self-serving elite.
These enormous healthcare and Pharma CEO payouts illustrate at
a glance that for-profit systems are difficult to harness to the public
good.
If
elected, would you support a publicly financed, privately provided
national health care program, which insures access to comprehensive health
care for all in the
U.S.
?
Yes. Americans deserve access to at
least a minimum of health care, particularly preventive care. I have
worked with type II diabetics and am very concerned about the epidemics of
diabetes, obesity,
hypertension, and cardiac disease which are lurking like time bombs in our
population. As the son of a
physician who works in a
County
Hospital
, we often do not realize that failure to treat and intervene early
is not a "savings" but rather a cost, a tax that must be paid
elsewhere.
Would
you support a not-for-profit, doctor-patient controlled system which would
eliminate the private health insurance industry (with protection for
eliminated workers) as the intermediary determining access and the level
of care?
Yes, substantially.
When we create a profit-center out of denying care to those who
need it, to feed the corporate insurance sector's requirement to
"make its numbers" on profit margins each year, we sow the seeds
of disaster. It is care-givers
and patients that have the vested interest in promoting long-term public
health – and that "health and wellness" is to the public
profit – measured in moral terms, not in Wall
Street's dollar-only metric.
Would
you support the government's ability to negotiate fair prices for
treatment as well as drugs, as it
does for those covered by the Veteran's Administration's plan?
Yes. I furthermore would
support intensive engagement of the FDA in its mission not to rubber-stamp
Big Pharma's latest new drugs, but to determine efficacy and safety. Our
government is useless if it does not protect the public from such harms as
the recent phen-fen and Vioxx debacles. My work in analyzing
clinical trials data from big-Pharma sponsored drug trials (both the
published and often-hidden data) has
been invaluable.
3)
Economic Justice:
The
current generation has seen unprecedented levels of economic disparity,
both among individuals (the richest 1% of Americans own almost 35% of all
wealth; the bottom half, only 2.5%) and in the ratio of
CEO pay to employee wages. Thirty-seven million people (equal to the
population of
California
) are living
in poverty in the
U.S.
These immoral levels of poverty, which disproportionately impact
communities of
color and women, can be significantly reduced through concerned
legislative effort - including a living wage for all workers, expanded
earned income tax credits, childcare assistance and housing vouchers.
Specifically, the federal government must fulfill its promise of
resources to Hurricane Katrina survivors so they can return to rebuild
their communities
in the
Gulf
Coast
.
Tax
burdens on the middle class can be eased if the wealthy pay their share.
In addition to working to roll back Bush's tax breaks for the wealthy, PDA
endorses the Equity in Income Act, limiting the amount of
CEO compensation afforded federal corporate tax deductions. In
emphatically supporting the workers'
right to organize, we also endorse the Employee Free Choice Act, which
establishes unions in any
workplace where a majority of workers sign union cards to join. In
the global arena, PDA supports anti-sweatshop legislation and fair trade
agreements which protect workers' rights as well as the environment, while
opposing wage reducing "free trade" agreements that protect only
corporate rights to exploit unprotected labor.
PDA also advocates for humane and comprehensive immigration reform,
which insures a fair, attainable path to citizenship and the rights of
undocumented workers in the workplace, affirming the dignity and integrity
of immigrant families.
What is your position on "Fair Trade" versus
"Free Trade" agreements?
"Free Trade" agreements
often prove to be neither Free nor substantially about furthering true
Trade, rather a rigging of the system to the benefit of the few, and
detriment of many. If 12
years of NAFTA
have not shown anything else, the ability of US Corn to dump a subsidized
product on Central American markets has the net effect of driving Central
American growers (many smallholders) off their own land,
into the ranks of urban poor, and finally, to desperate migrations to
other countries.
This
massive migration pressure is felt first in border areas including
San Diego
County
. NAFTA and its
ilk (such as the recent Peru-CAFTA) have failed all parties.
I am strongly supportive of fair wages being paid on both sides of
the border, and to these ends, trade agreements not by supra-national
bodies such as the WTO, but from representation of workers and the
citizens, are of utmost importance to all.
Will you have pledge to reverse the tax
cuts on the wealthiest Americans?
I pledge to restore tax fairness, and
to do this, the repeal of the economically-disastrous Bush tax cuts is
essential -- (Even conservative Alan Greenspan, former head of the Federal
Reserve, insists on that point.)
Having
already thought about the matter, I would support a “Tobin Tax” on
financial derivative transactions (the outstanding notional amount is
roughly $516 trillion) of about 0.5% to 1%.
Congress must act now to restore fairness, such that Wall Street
transactions of billions and trillions are taxed in a fashion not
creating unfairness to the laboring man and woman.
Do you support the right of workers to
organize, in any situation?
I support the right of workers to
organize, to discuss organization, and if a majority agree to form a labor
organization, then management should immediately begin a formal process
that acknowledges and formally recognizes this process, while creating
protections for workers who wish to organize.
What is your relationship to labor
nationally and in your district?
I am in support of Organized Labor, nationally –and I believe that to
be pro-Labor is to be pro-Family and furthermore pro-strong American
Middle Class. A strong an engaged middle class is a bulwark of liberty,
and of the "domestic tranquility" referred to in the
Constitution. I work on
behalf of a plaintiffs’ firm which represents Union clients in
securities fraud class-action suits, when union pension funds have
been
defrauded -- these unions include SEIU, UNITE-HERE, and others.
Do you have union endorsements and supporters
in your district?
I have no union endorsements at this time. I will seek the endorsement
of particular labor unions in the
53rd District.
What is your approach to bringing
communities "out of poverty"?
1)
Recognize the root causes of the poverty cycle in a specific
community, and address them
with long-range programs
2)
Business incentive and job creation: most communities on
borderline poverty are ready and willing
to work. They lack the job training & access to capital -- which the
wealthy often enjoy as a matter
of birthright.
3)
Homeownership & foreclosure:
I support public & private partnerships in the community which
assist at-risk homeowners who face late payment or mortgage default. The
2/28 and 3/27 ARM mortgages (called “subprime”) often result in
rapidly increasing “balloon payments.” Default leads to foreclosure
leads to neighborhood decay I support neighborhood which assist at-risk
homeowners from predatory lending, and can save homeowners from
foreclosure – programs in
Chicago
have
been incredibly successful in this regard.
Would you support the legislation of
the "out of poverty" caucus?
Yes.
Poverty is an issue addressed through equitable and mandatory education
standards, through investment in human capital across the country, and
requires equitable taxation and healthcare support to achieve the goal. We
all stand to gain if poverty is addressed honestly, and with moral force.
What efforts would you support to
provide meaningful resources to Katrina survivors?
In 2005 and 2006, the United States
government missed, (whether through negligence or by intention)
an incredibly important opportunity in the aftermath of the
flooding and destruction of many lower Wards in
New Orleans– to bring job skills and educational training to the poor
communities of the Lower 9th Ward
and elsewhere. Instead, the Federal Government sent FEMA trailers with
toxic formaldehyde. This
does nothing to alleviate either acute or long-term issues.
Out of crisis, opportunity:
New Orleans
residents,
for example, could be right now working with groups like Rebuild Green to
construct affordable and environmentally-sound housing in their own
neighborhoods, “Green Collar” jobs.
Frequently all we need
but do is “open the door” – and it is morally appalling that our
government does not.
Do you support comprehensive
and humane immigration reform as outlined above?
I
do.
Have you reached out to immigrant
communities and advocates in your district?
I have established alliances with advocates who work for justice and
represent groups of different ethnic identities.
4) Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections:
The
U.S.
election system is in crisis. Not
only are the usual corrupting factors of money and corporate lobbying as
rampant as perhaps at any time in U.S. history, but the new millennium
along with the fallout from the contested 2000 election - have ushered in
a qualitative change in the conduct of our elections: Centuries of
tradition in which citizens, government officials and Party
representatives oversaw physical evidence of voter intent have fallen to
the rise of the machines. This sea change, from paper to ephemeral
electrons, brings much more than the implicit demand to trust the
invisible: the move to computers means that 85% of
America
has ceded control of its elections to third-party vendors, whose legal
claims regarding proprietary software bring corporate control of the
entire voting process. PDA thus supports federal legislation that would
ban the use of touch-screen (“DRE”) voting
machines.
Will you pledge, if elected, to support
only voting methods in which ballots are cast on paper?
The ballot of record must be defined not as the computer coordinates of
the vote record, but the Paper Ballot.
I have been a long time advocate of auditable, verifiable
elections, whether via hand-counted paper ballots at the Precinct, or
other verifiable, auditable method, consistently employing Paper Ballots.
I will lead the fight in Congress not for compromise solutions, but for
simple and clear legislative reform – and I believe that it is
imperative to restore Voter Trust and Confidence in our election systems.
The well-documented irregularities of the elections of 2000, 2002, 2004
and 2006 demonstrate that vote suppression, and computerized tabulation,
represent "clear and present dangers" to fair, transparent, and
open democracy.
Do you pledge to support
“Clean Money” public financing of public elections?
Yes.
“Clean Money” is part of important three-part reforms
1)
sweeping campaign finance reform (no
bundling, lowered maximum individual contributions, matching public funds)
2)
verifiable voting aka “paper ballots” (no computerized tabulation)
3)
fair redistricting, to end gerrymandering of absurd districts which are
purely designed to promote incumbency.
All
three areas require immediate action.
Would you accept public
financing for your current campaign?
Yes – particularly upon demonstrating support within the community
for my candidacy.
Do you support the restoration of
voting rights to past felony offenders?
Yes.
Do you support same-day voting
registration?
Absolutely.
Would you oppose the onerous
requirement of official photo identification before affording citizens
access
to the polls?
I oppose ID requirements at the
polls.
Photo
and “REAL-ID” requirements are designed to suppress voting among
elderly and ethnic groups.
5) Environment/ Global Warming:
No
issue reveals more clearly the flaws of the
U.S.
political-economic system than global warming - the dominance of greed and
corporate power over the public good, and the nearsighted focus on the
short-term over the welfare of
future generations. It is
known that the U.S. has the natural resources to power the entire country
solely from clean, “alternative” sources of power- whether with solar cells that would require a
miniscule fraction of the California
desert, or from wind turbines on the Great Plains and in the Great Lakes. It
has also often been said that we need a
new Apollo Program for clean energy (if not Manhattan Project), in which
science, industry and government would cooperate on a crash course to
produce novel results in a limited period. Immediate action would include raising the
auto fuel economy and impose mandatory caps on carbon pollution while
investing in public transportation, energy conservation technologies and
alternative energy development--in the process, creating new jobs, which
pay well.
PDA calls on the Democratic majority in
Congress to lead boldly in reducing our country's oil dependence and use
of fossil fuels.
Will you pledge to take an uncompromising
leadership role on legislation to enact the enormous changes
and sacrifices that will be required to stem Global Warming?
Yes.
I
plan to be in the vanguard of this legislation. Although sustainable
energy and climate policy is often
seen as “bad for business” --
it is more apparent that it is merely “bad for ExxonMobil and Big
Oil.”
There are incredibly exciting job creation possibilities, “green
collar” jobs, which we will implement in
San Diego
County
area, and show the rest of the country (and doubters) that the transition
to sustainable
energy solutions will actually drive economic growth.
Will you pledge to enact an Apollo
Program for clean energy?
I will fight to enact the
“Apollo
Alliance
” for renewable and sustainable energy. It all starts with simple
and useful conservation measures.
What kind of personal vehicle do
you currently drive? Is it rated ZEV, or PZEV?
My primary personal transportation is generally a shared carpool.
(I don’t know how that rates on ZEV scale)
My summer & fall transportation is frequently a bicycle, and
public transportation for the rest. During
2007, I challenged myself to reduce personal gasoline consumption by 50%,
which I met, as well as 20% reduction in electricity, natural gas, and
water. It proved very possible
with creative solutions. In Congress, I will champion national legislation
that turns the same practical solutions into public policy.
Local Issue:
Blackwater has initiated the establishment a training camp in
Potrero
CA
. Congressman Bob Filner has
come out in full opposition to this camp.
What
will you do specifically to support him in keeping Blackwater out of
San Diego
County
?
I will Stand Up with Bob Filner. All too frequently, the other
Democratic Representative in
San Diego
county fails to stand up and speak out to the moral imperatives of our
County, as Democrats, and as
human beings.
I
will fight for legislation, proposed by Filner and others, that bans the
use of any land, public or private, for private military contractors (PMCs)
such as Blackwater, DynCorp, Kroll, or others.
Private mercenary armies are inimical to freedom, much as Madison
and others recognized in the late 1700s.
What is your position on using
military contractors in our military actions abroad?
This is a very bad idea.
The
possibility arises that 1) private contractors are hired on a different
pay scale, which is unfair to our troops 2) private contractors would be
asked to perform task which escape the Geneva Conventions and oversight
bodies including Congress and 3) that someday, somewhere, a contingent of
private mercenaries might massacre innocent people at an intersection.
If
Congress does not act forcefully to assert its oversight authority, such
things could someday come to
pass, and I would predict that the private companies involved would
attempt to use some legal loophole to escape accountability.
In our cities, such as
New Orleans
?
Strongly opposed.
Blackwater is the for-hire equivalent of the Brownshirts in
Germany
of the 1930s.
I
recall that a for-hire mercenary in
New Orleans
related this story about encountering, and then gunning down Americans:
[The private security contractor] said he and his men were armed
with AR-15s and
Glocks and that they unleashed a barrage of bullets in the general
direction of the alleged shooters on the overpass. "After that, all I
heard was moaning and screaming, and the shooting stopped. That was it.
Enough said."
On our border?
We can decide how to protect, police
or defend our borders according to public law, and employing men and women
who are accountable to public authorities.
Finance
Please
estimate your campaign costs:
Primary Election: $12,000
General Election: $ unknown
How much money have you raised to
date?
Approximately $6,200.
I have not yet engaged in directed fundraising, choosing to first
work to establish myself as a viable progressive candidate -- and despite
the lack of intentional fundraising, money has been donated from points
across the political spectrum. I
am grateful and humbled to see this unsolicited outpouring.
Please list independent expenditures that may
impact your race:
My campaign will focus on voter outreach and
education, with a large volunteer contingent.
I foresee printing and mailing costs to support my canvassing and
field efforts.
__________________________________________
Candidate
Endorsement Meeting Feb.
21
Hear the Candidates CA
50 and CA 52
Giovanni's at 6pm Supper -
6:30 pm Registration - 7:00 pm Meeting
Here are the Candidates
Responses!
CA 50
__________________________________________
Cheryl
Ede -
PDA
Metro San Diego Chapter
2008
Endorsement Questionnaire
U.
S. House of Representatives
Return to:
Judy Hess
judyhess@gmail.com
j.hess@cox.net
and
Diane Shamis Field@pdamerica.org
Please
fill out this form if you are interested in pursuing an endorsement by PDA
Metro San Diego Chapter.
We are part of Progressive Democrats of America, a nation-
wide grassroots organization of 100,000
members that works inside the Democratic Party and outside in movements
for peace and justice.
Please return this questionnaire by the deadline: Feb.14 , 2008.
Altering or deleting the questions on this form may lead to
disqualification.
Please note that your answers on this questionnaire may be made public. If
you need additional space to answer questions, please attach additional
pages to the questionnaire. If
you have any questions regarding this questionnaire, please contact judyhess@gmail.com
or call 619-421-6403.
Candidate and Campaign Information:
Candidate
Name: Cheryl
Martin Ede
Address:
5210 Harbour Heights Court
City, State, Zip: San Diego, CA 92109
E-mail
Address: cmede@san.rr.com
Office for which you are running: Congress
– CA 50th district
Date of Election: June
3, 2008
Registered Political Party: Democratic
Party
Campaign Manager:
Ken Lindeneau Phone:
(619) 417-9244
Fax: __________________Campaign Consultant: ____________
Phone: ___________
Fax: _________________
Campaign Address: 5210
Harbour Heights Ct. ., San Diego, CA 92109
List endorsements from
organizations and/or individuals:
Tricia
Baker, Tyler Baker, Lori Brubeck, Linda Collier, Toni Davies, Marette
Esperance, Pam Evans, Melissa Ford, Harry Markowitz, Ed Neete, John Olson,
Joan Rich, Deborah Roon, John Theroux,
I am seeking endorsement of the Democratic Party, the California
Teachers’ Association, San Diego Education Association, and the San
Diego Labor Council.
How would you describe yourself
politically (i.e. progressive; moderate democrat, etc.)?
Progressive
Democrat
List elective or political party offices you have held, including
committee appointments:
I
am the SDEA Association Representative for the San Diego Unified School
District’s school psychologists.
What is your primary occupation?
School
and clinical psychologist
Why are you running for Congress?
(100 word limit)
I
want the U.S. to be a more positive force in the world, with renewable
energy technology products surpassing our exports of weapons.
I want to end U.S. military domination of the earth, which creates
enemies, wars, debts, and needlessly risks young military men and
women’s lives. I support universal health care and stem-cell research,
which promises a healthier and more robust people. I support
comprehensive and core economic solutions to poverty, illegal immigration
and the growing disparity
between the richest and poorest. I
want Congress to reclaim its Constitutional responsibilities to the
people.
Issues Specific to Office:
What experiences have prepared
you to run for Congress?
My life experiences have prepared
me. As a young adult, I was
interested in serving our country, inspired by the ideals of the Peace
Corps. I was interested in
history and in becoming a foreign services officer.
I entered the work force as a history teacher in public education,
and began a master’s program in history.
The loss of a loved one on Memorial Day, at the end of my first
year of teaching, changed my course. Rocky
Edmondson was shot down in North Vietnam, along with seven other crew
members; he became an MIA, and his remains were never found.
This led me to examine more critically the actions and priorities
of our presidents and members of Congress.
This loss, along with the tragedies of the assassinations of John
Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy, led me to a more
introspective career as a psychologist.
My introspective path, rather than the initial world-oriented career,
helped me develop personal strengths that uniquely qualify me for
Congress. Especially helpful
are the years of personal analysis psychologists are recommended to
undergo, so our own issues do not interfere with helping our clients.
It may be why I can deal with information without being overwhelmed
by grief or anger, as it is painful, for example, to watch what we have
done in Iraq. In the spirit of
diversity, my psychologist and social-scientist perspective will be a good
addition to the numerous attorney perspectives we already have.
As a school psychologist, I have learned about bullying
behavior--it is a prevalent problem in our schools; I anticipate it may
occur in Congress. The tactics of bullying are the same whether done by an
8-year-old, or a 58 year-old. I
recognize these tactics, and have the emotional stamina to deal
appropriately with them.
The political activism events I initiated, during and immediately after
the 2004 Kerry campaign, demonstrate my leadership and problem-solving
abilities. (See below: ‘Have you participated in events… opposing the
Iraq war?’)
The years of experience in the public schools of San Diego County,
including the 50th district, translate into an awareness of the major
struggles and obstacles facing children and their families.
Whatever the issue, I know a particular child and family impacted
by that issue, and will be guided by the experiences of real individuals.
I will not forget the human faces.
If you receive the endorsement of
Progressive Democrats of America, how do you intend to use it?
Add
the information to my web site and to literature I distribute during my
campaign.
Please list the top three
issues on which you will take leadership if elected:
1)
Reclaim Congressional oversight into (a) the budgets of the Defense
Department and CIA, and (b) the size and number of military bases and
outposts throughout the world, charted by where oil is located, and (c)
the global CIA activities.
2) Support legislation to jump start the alternative and renewable energy
industries to combat global warming, create jobs, and inspire a new
innovative period in U.S. history. This
works hand in hand with the number one issue, as the less we rely on oil,
the less pressure to establish military outposts all over the globe,
freeing taxpayer dollars that are sorely need.
3) Work to support universal health care for all; concomitantly, work to
support stem-cell research, which offers promise to people throughout the
world for healthier futures.
Do you agree with Congress’ decision to
reauthorize the Patriot Act? No.
Why
or why not?
Congress has given too much authority and
privilege, and allowed too much secrecy to the executive branch.
This reduces the separation of powers and contributes to an
imperial presidency. Secrecy
breeds corruption.
If elected, which committee(s) would
you prefer to serve on and why?
The
Committee on Armed Services; The Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence; The Select Committee on Energy
Independence
and Global Warming.
These
committees address the first two priorities.
With money saved by creating a friendlier, rather than hostile
approach to the world, U.S. taxpayers will have funds available for health
care and other pressing needs.
Federal Issues:
1)
Iraq
:
PDA supports an immediate start to a rapid and
complete withdrawal
from
Iraq
of all troops and military
contractors, and has championed
legislation that would withhold funding for any other military purpose
there.
In addition, PDA believes that the U.S. must revise its strategy for
the region by removing these forces from the
Mideast
entirely, rather than
just "redeploying" them within the region. PDA advocates a shift
in U.S. foreign
policy from reckless unilateralism toward cooperation and diplomacy--so
that people of other countries know
us more by our helping hand than our slugging arm. Furthermore, PDA
supports the redirecting of resources
allocated for military spending to human needs.
Will you pledge to support such
immediate and total withdrawal from Iraq of the military forces, including
supporting legislation towards this goal?
Yes.
Withdrawal includes no permanent U.S. military bases or outposts in
Iraq.
I
also would not approve the sale of $20 billion worth of weapons that the
Bush administration announced (January 15, 2008) it would make to Saudi
Arabia, confident of getting congressional approval.
The country that spawned Osama bin Laden, the country that was home
to most of those who attacked us on September 11, 2001, should not get $20
billion dollars worth of our finest weapons.
This leaves taxpayers burdened with paying for the upgrade for
weapons to outdo those sold. All
of us must wonder, is there another Saudi who wants to harm us, who may
get his hands on those weapons?
In addition, will you forswear
any preemptive military attacks upon any
nation?
Absolutely!
This is my priority! I am inspired by the memory of one dead U.S.
Air Force officer, who represents, to me, thousands of other needlessly
dead young men and women, who served in the U.S.
Navy, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Marine Corps, the U.S. Army, and the National
Guard and Reserves. He
also represents, to me, future young people who will die if we continue to
dominate the world
militarily,
and create enemies in the process.
No one should be asked by the Commander in Chief nor authorized
by Congress (either through its Constitutional power to declare war or its
authorization of war powers to
the president) to go to war and put his or her life on the line, unless it
is for the defense of our country.
The standard for those with decision-making powers must be:
“Are conditions so dire that my son,
daughter, grandson, or granddaughter must risk his or her life to save our
country?”
Will you commit to fully support investigations into the White House's
false
claims justifying the invasion
of
Iraq
, and would you support impeachment of Bush, Cheney and other
administration officials for these and other high crimes?
Yes!
Below is a letter I sent to my representative and Senators and to
the major media
Dear
______:
The future of the U.S. and the world must be separated from President
Bush’s fate and place in history. What is good for the U.S. and
the world is not the same as what is good for President Bush’s place in
history. The first step to bring peace to Iraq is to follow our
Constitution and hold the president responsible for his actions.
Then, we must apologize to Iraqis for the wrongdoings we perpetrated on
them. Finally, the U.S. must reach out to the international
community and truly mean we will help Iraq form a stable government,
without establishing permanent military bases in their country.
Our greatest generation is being followed by our most gullible, easily
duped generation. History will judge not only this president and his
administration, but Americans who allowed one of the world’s greatest
travesties to occur without investigating events, seeking justice, or
holding anyone responsible. Congress must fulfill its constitutional
obligation to investigate fully the deceptions that led to the U.S.
invasion of Iraq, investigate fully the planning and management of Iraq
after the U.S. invasion, debate and determine the way out of our military
involvement in Iraq, and support political and international efforts to
bring peace to the region. If warranted by Congress’
investigation, President Bush and Vice-President Cheney must be impeached.
To do otherwise would allow a great injustice to be met with silence.
Because of President Bush’s determination to get Saddam Hussein,
thousands of innocent people have been killed, beginning with the
pulverization of the wrong people in the first aerial bombing of Baghdad.
The greatest of President Bush’s deceptions was that if we did not
invade Iraq, Americans, and the world, would see a “mushroom cloud”
from Iraq’s nuclear attack on us. The fact that Saddam Hussein
must have a delivery system for this supposed nuclear weapon was not
addressed by anyone in authority. The fact that our nuclear experts
in the Department of Energy had negated the idea that Saddam Hussein had
nuclear capability was not factored into decisions made by our leaders.
Proof of President Bush’s deceptions comes in the form of polls showing
a large percentage of Americans, for many years, had their facts wrong
regarding who was responsible for the attacks on September 11,
2001—because they listened to and believed the president.
No one with power willingly gives it up; rather, power must be wrested
from the powerful. It is time American citizens and Congress act
responsibly and assume their legitimate power. Not holding this
president and vice-president responsible for their actions is
unconscionable. This stance, in essence, expresses the idea that it
is too complicated and complex to follow the Constitution at this moment
in our history, so we will set it aside. Without impeachment
proceedings, the public is robbed of a confrontation with facts that would
be revealed in hearings--facts that would serve as our common knowledge,
from which we would begin to problem solve. Impeachment will correct our
course at home, allow us to apologize to Iraqis for the wrong we
perpetrated on them, and help us reach out to the international community
and truly mean that we will help Iraq form a stable government, without
establishing permanent military bases in their country.
Until Congress addresses these complex and core issues, we are in danger
of allowing President Bush to proceed with a policy that projects
hostility toward many in the world, further escalating the possibility of
future wars. To focus and fund war at the expense of diplomacy,
international relations, conflict resolution and peace is wrong. Our
permanent military bases throughout the world fuel the fires of terrorism,
and recruit more enemies of the U.S., that our young people must
fight for and die. The problem of global warming alone provides an
opportunity for all peoples of the world to work together to save our
planet for future humans. Congress must carry out its constitutional
obligations now.
Sincerely,
Cheryl Ede
5210
Harbour Heights Ct.
San Diego, CA 92109
Have you participated in or
spoken at any events, demonstrations, meetings or teach-ins opposing the
Iraq war and occupation?
Yes!
Have you organized any such events?
Yes!
My volunteer work in the 2004 Kerry campaign was prompted by
President Bush’s preemptive war in Iraq—‘we have to go to war to
prevent war’—combined with Kerry’s words as a young man:
“How do
you ask the last man to die for a mistake?”
I also initiated a separate project inspired by an investigative report
published in the New York Times
on October 3, 2004, which WAS NOT REPORTED IN THE SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE!
The
report stated our nuclear experts in the Department of Energy (well before
the invasion and before
President Bush’s references to a “mushroom cloud”) rejected the idea
that Saddam Hussein had nuclear capability. The same Department of Energy
experts were prohibited from reporting their conclusion to
the public or press, under the guise that if Saddam Hussein knew their
conclusion, he would know what
to say to the U.N. weapons inspectors.
This may be the origin of truthiness!
Using shared e-mail lists of Kerry supporters, I forwarded a letter
outlining some of the N.Y.Times’
major findings, asked for help in publishing it via the purchase of an ad
in the U-T (to insure readers
would be informed prior to the election), and collected $2740 to pay for
the ad. The letter, signed by 48 individuals, appeared in the Sunday
paper, October 31, 2004. The
Union-Tribune took our money, and
hid our message amongst ads for paint, spas and carpets.
The letter is on my web site on the “political activism” page.
A small consolation for me was the San Diego City Beat named me in its
Champs and Chumps’ column
the following week. I was the
champ because I attempted to inform San Diegans; Roger Hedgecock was
the chump, because he rallied his listeners to complain so the public
library would not show Michael
Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11 prior to the election.
After the election, I organized a protest of the San Diego Union-Tribune,
as our representative of the “free-press,” during the Ohio recount of
the 2004 presidential election. The
mass media, including the
U-T, DID NOT
REPORT
ON
THE
OHIO
RECOUNT! I also contacted
local television stations, so
the event was covered on the evening news.
I was written up in the San Diego City Beat again.
Protesters signed a letter to the Los Angeles Times, copied and delivered
to the San Diego
Union-Tribune on the day of the protest, asking the Times to consider,
once again, opening a San
Diego branch of the Los Angeles Times.
2) Health Care:
There are over 46 million uninsured people living in
America, the majority of which are working Americans. Every year, nearly
18,000 people die unnecessarily as a direct result of their lack of health
insurance. Millions, with health insurance, maintain inadequate, overly
expensive coverage and face the peril of denials of claims or termination
of benefits if a family member becomes seriously ill--one of the leading
causes of bankruptcy in the U.S. While spending twice as much on health
care as any other industrialized country, our system performs poorly,
spending more money for less coverage, maximizing profits by finding ways
to deny care. The private insurance bureaucracy expends one-third of
health care money on waste, administrative paperwork, advertising and
corporate profits. The current Medicare program for senior citizens spends
under 4% of its budget for its overhead costs. Meanwhile, poor health,
escalating health insurance premiums and spiraling health care costs
impair our economy and job creation in the U.S.
PDA
has endorsed HR 676, the National Health Insurance/"Expanded and
Improved Medicare-for-All" Act. To guarantee comprehensive health
care for all, PDA supports the replacement of the current profit-driven
system, publicly financed, privately provided health care program. This
"Medicare for All" national plan would save more than $350
billion per year, enough new money to provide guaranteed comprehensive
health care for all. This system would insure portable and uniform
benefits regardless of income. With no deductibles or co-pays, this plan
would encourage preventive care and restore a doctor and patient
controlled health care system affording choice of providers and fair,
publicly negotiated payment for both treatment and medication.
What is your approach to the
health care crisis?
My
approach is that our health care system needs a major overhaul, as it puts
the profits of some corporations above the health of our citizens.
I decided to run for office in November 2007, after Bilbray did not vote
to override the president’s veto
of the Children’s Health Care Initiative.
I need to look no further than my family to know our nation has
a health-care crisis. Both of
my nieces have serious health problems.
If you are a single-income parent,
such as my niece Gina, and you get diabetes, your medical expenses will
skyrocket—especially if you
are unlucky enough to have a kidney stone attack that requires urgent
medical attention. It will be
impossible for you to stay in the black.
My niece Kelsa was fortunate to have an attorney in the family,
otherwise her health insurance company may have continued to refuse to pay
for the back surgery her
doctor recommended and her father paid for, so the doctor would perform
the needed surgery. Gina is an
associate professor in the mass communication department at Oklahoma State
University; Kelsa is a registered nurse. What happens to people who are
not as highly educated, who don’t have health
insurance, or don’t have families to back them up?
What is your view of Guaranteed Health Care through an Expanded and
Improved Medicare-for-All system?
I
favor considering this as a viable solution to our health-care crisis.
If elected, would you support a
publicly financed, privately provided national health care program, which
insures access to comprehensive health care for all in the U.S.?
Yes.
Would you support a
not-for-profit, doctor-patient controlled system which would eliminate the
private health insurance industry (with protection for eliminated workers)
as the intermediary determining access and the level of care?
Yes.
Would you support the government's ability to negotiate fair prices for
treatment as well as drugs, as it does for those covered by the Veteran's
Administration's plan?
Yes.
3) Economic Justice:
The current generation has seen unprecedented levels of economic
disparity, both among individuals (the richest 1% of Americans own almost
35% of all wealth; the bottom half, only 2.5%) and in the ratio of CEO pay
to employee wages.Thirty-seven million people (equal to the population of
California) are living in poverty in the U.S. These immoral levels of
poverty, which disproportionate impact communities of color and women, can
be significantly reduced through concerned legislative effort - including
a living wage for all workers, expanded earned income tax credits,
childcare assistance and housing vouchers. Specifically, the federal
government must fulfill its promise of resources to Hurricane Katrina
survivors so they can return to rebuild their communities in the Gulf
Coast.
Tax
burdens on the middle class can be eased if the wealthy pay their share.
In addition to working to roll back Bush's tax breaks for the wealthy, PDA
endorses the Equity in Income Act, limiting the amount of CEO compensation
afforded federal corporate tax deductions. In emphatically supporting the
workers' right to organize, we
also endorse the Employee Free Choice Act, which establishes unions in any
workplace where a majority of workers sign union cards to join. In the
global arena, PDA supports
anti-sweatshop legislation and fair trade agreements which protect
workers' rights as well as the environment, while opposing wage-reducing
"free trade" agreements that protect only corporate rights to
exploit unprotected labor. PDA also advocates for humane and comprehensive
immigration reform, which insures a fair, attainable path to citizenship
and the rights of undocumented workers in the workplace, affirming the
dignity and integrity of immigrant families.
What is your position on
"Fair Trade" versus "Free Trade" agreements?
I
favor “Fair Trade” agreements, as well as a new look at our current
trade agreements.
Will you have pledge to reverse
the tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans?
Yes,
I agree with Warren Buffett.
Do you support the right of
workers to organize, in any situation?
Yes.
What is your relationship to labor nationally and in your district?
I
am a member of a local educators’ association, the San Diego Education
Association, as well as the California Teachers’ Association, and the
National Education Association. I
am the SDEA Association Representative for the 140 school psychologists
employed in the San Diego Unified School District.
Do you have union endorsements and supporters in your district?
I
am seeking an endorsement by my association, CTA and the San Diego County
Labor Council.
What is your approach to
bringing communities "out of poverty"?
Health
care reform is an important component of bringing people “out of
poverty.” Education and job
training, including vocational training, are necessary for public school
students, and also for adults. Small
businesses, that meet the needs and demands of the local community, can
contribute greatly to providing job opportunities that offer a viable
alternative to the lure of gangs and drugs that affect too many young
people who have a sense of hopelessness about their futures. Starting a
new age of innovation--with the renewable and alternative energy industry
and stem-cell research in the lead--will create jobs and bright futures
for many.
Would you support the
legislation of the "out of poverty" caucus?
Yes
What efforts would you support
to provide meaningful resources to Katrina survivors?
My
response to bringing communities “out of poverty,” applies to Katrina
survivors. In addition, the
engineering and environmental issues evidenced by the Katrina disaster
must be addressed. The work
necessary to make corrections and rebuild homes and businesses should be
open to Katrina survivors who have the necessary skills or the ability to
learn them.
Do you support comprehensive and
humane immigration reform as outlined above?
Yes
Have you reached out to immigrant communities and advocates in your
district?
Not
yet - my outreach is in its infancy. I will not support legislation that
targets the poor people of Mexico as scapegoats for all of our nation’s
economic and job ills.
The illegal immigration problem is analogous
to the Bush administration’s stance on torture—i.e., on the one hand
“we do not torture,” but on the other hand, we do.
Regarding illegal immigration, we do not allow illegal immigration;
on the other hand, when businesses need cheap labor, we do.
4) Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections:
The
U.S. election system is in crisis. Not only are the usual corrupting
factors of money and corporate lobbying as rampant as perhaps at any time
in U.S. history, but the new millennium – along with the fallout from
the contested 2000 election - have ushered in a qualitative change in the
conduct of our elections: Centuries of tradition in which citizens,
government officials and Party representatives oversaw physical evidence
of voter intent have fallen to the rise of the machines. This sea change,
from paper to ephemeral electrons, brings much more than the implicit
demand to trust the invisible: the move to computers means that 85% of
America has ceded control of its elections to third-party vendors, whose
legal claims regarding proprietary software bring corporate control of the
entire voting process. PDA thus supports federal legislation that would
ban the use of touch-screen (“DRE”) voting machines.
Will
you pledge, if elected, to support only voting methods in which ballots
are cast on paper?
Absolutely!
Do you pledge to support “Clean Money” public financing of public
elections?
Yes. I
look forward to the day when members of Congress are chosen for the
content of their character, rather than the size of their war chests.
Would
you accept public financing for your current campaign?
Yes,
I would very much welcome it!
Do you support the restoration
of voting rights to past felony offenders?
Yes!
Do you support same-day voting
registration?
Yes.
Would you oppose the onerous requirement of official photo identification
before affording citizens access to the polls?
Yes.
Official photos are especially problematic for some citizens, such
as homeless people, who want to vote.
5)
Environment/ Global Warming:
No issue reveals more clearly the flaws of the U.S. political-economic
system than global warming - the dominance of greed and corporate power
over the public good, and the near-sighted focus on the short-term over
the welfare of future generations. It is known that the U.S. has the
natural resources to power the entire country solely from clean,
“alternative” sources of power- whether with solar cells that would
require a miniscule fraction of the California desert, or from wind
turbines on the Great Plains and in the Great Lakes. It has also often
been said that we need a new Apollo Program for clean energy (if not
Manhattan Project), in which science, industry and government would
cooperate on a crash course to produce novel results in a limited period. Immediate
action would include raising the auto fuel economy and impose mandatory
caps on carbon pollution while investing in public transportation, energy
conservation technologies and alternative energy development--in the
process, creating new jobs which pay well. .
PDA calls on the Democratic majority in Congress to lead boldly in
reducing our country's oil dependence and use of fossil fuels.
Will you pledge to take an uncompromising leadership role on legislation
to enact the enormous changes and sacrifices that will be required to stem
Global Warming?
Absolutely!
Please see above statements.
Will you pledge to enact an Apollo
Program for clean energy?
Yes!
Please see above statements.
What kind of personal vehicle do you currently drive? Is it rated ZEV, or
PZEV?
I currently drive a 1998 Buick Royale, and
will be driving a Smart car. Last
year, my husband and I made a deposit so that we will be one of 30,000 who
will get one; ours is blue.
You did not ask about solar energy—we are in the process of installing
solar panels so that our use of electricity will be greatly reduced.
Local
Issue:
Blackwater
has initiated the establishment a training camp in Potrero CA.
Congressman Bob Filner has come out in full opposition to this
camp.
What
will you do specifically to support him in keeping Blackwater out of San
Diego County?
Support
his efforts to organize pressure on the County Board of Supervisors to
honor the wishes of the local community and not allow Blackwater to build
a training camp in Potrero.
What
is your position on using military contractors in our military actions
abroad?
I am opposed to outsourcing military
activities.
In
our cities, such as
New Orleans
?
Military contractors should not be rebuilding
New Orleans. The people of New
Orleans who are in need of jobs should be the first to be considered to
rebuild their city and communities.
On
our border?
The Border Patrol should be used to
enforce our laws, not military contractors.
Finance:
Please estimate your campaign costs:
Unknown at this time.
My campaign is based on the grapevine method.
I have many supporters, both friends and work colleagues, who are
sending my web site to friends and family members in the 50th district.
I have lived in Pacific Beach since 1976, and have a wide
friendship circle throughout the 50th district because I belonged to a
running club for many years. Runners are energetic people!
Although I am fundraising, I am more interested in people voting
for me. I am reaching out to
Republican friends and neighbors from the outset, and plan to attend many
‘meet-the-candidate’ events. I
have begun to attend Democratic Club meetings within the 50th district,
and will continue this effort until the primary election is over.
This will provide an opportunity to become acquainted with members.
My
campaign expenses include yard signs and “static clings” (decals that
attach to the inside of a rear car window, using no adhesive).
The message on both: CherylEdeForCongress.org.
This
will allow for name recognition, and others will learn about me via my web
site, which is very comprehensive. My
web site contains links to other information, and is not all about me.
The web site exemplifies my aspiration, expressed beautifully by
Gabriel Garcia Marquez, author of “Love in the Time of Cholera,” in
describing his late friend, Frank del Olmo, associate editor of the
Los Angeles
Times: “He did journalism
without pause, enslaved by the certainty that the world would be better as
long as we faced it.” That
is my message—it is time we faced the world, and I can lead
the way.
Primary Election:
I
have purchased yard signs and “static cling” decals so far.
General Election: ___________
How much money have you raised to date? I
have just begun fundraising efforts, and only recently informed friends,
who want to contribute, that I am ready to receive contributions.
My first rally is Saturday, February 16, 2008.
Please list independent
expenditures that may impact your race:
None
known at this time.
___________________________________________Ni
Nick
Liebham -
*
(Nick's original submission in two
documents below this conforming questionnaire Nick
did not conform to National requirements, and did not answer a number of
questions - I (Judy Hess)
had to plug his answers into the national format (directly below)
for publication on the national
website as best I could. Nick contacted me indicating that he
did not feel the way it was reformatted made a fair representation of his
answers, so at his request, I've also posted his submission as received.
It is below this document.)
Please
be sure to scroll below
his documents to read CA 52 Candidate Vickie Butcher's responses
I take full responsibility
for the decision to publish the original responses, and I apologize for
any inconvenience.
PDA
Metro San Diego Chapter
2008
Endorsement Questionnaire
U.
S. House of Representatives
Return to:
Judy Hess
judyhess@gmail.com
j.hess@cox.net
and
Diane Shamis Field@pdamerica.org
Please fill out this form if you are
interested in pursuing an endorsement by PDA Metro San Diego Chapter.
We are part of Progressive Democrats of America, a nation- wide
grassroots organization of 100,000 members that works inside the
Democratic Party and outside in movements for peace and justice.
Please return this questionnaire by the deadline: Feb.14 , 2008.
Altering or deleting the questions on this form may lead to
disqualification.
Please note that your answers on this questionnaire may be made public. If
you need additional space to answer questions, please attach additional
pages to the questionnaire. If
you have any questions regarding this questionnaire, please contact judyhess@gmail.com
or call 619-421-6403.
Candidate and Campaign Information:
Candidate Name: _ Nick Leibham
Address: 2240
Encinitas Blvd., Ste D-111
City, State, Zip: Encinitas,
CA 92024
E-mail Address: nick@picknick08.com
Office for which you are running: US
Congress, 50th District of California
Date of Election: June
3rd, 2008
Registered Political Party: Democrat
Campaign Manager: Alec Evans Phone:
858-427-4804
Fax: __________________
Campaign Consultant: ____________ Phone:
___________ Fax:
_________________
Campaign Address: 2240 Encinitas Blvd
Ste D-111
Encinitas, CA 92024
List endorsements from organizations and/or individuals:
How would you describe yourself
politically (i.e. progressive; moderate democrat, etc.)?
List elective or political
party offices you have held, including committee appointments:
What is your primary
occupation?
Practicing attorney here in
San Diego
’s
North
County
.
Why are you running for Congress? (100
word limit)
I am running for Congress because
I was asked by the community that I live in to once again enter
public service. This is a critical time, a time to renew the vision and
promise of the Founding Fathers.
Issues Specific to Office:
What experiences have prepared you to run for Congress?
Nick is a practicing attorney here in
San Diego’s North County. He’s your neighbor and a contributing
member of our community. Born and raised in Oregon, he attended college in
Hawaii. Upon graduating
Nick felt the calling of the classroom; graduating cum laude with a B.A.
in Political and Historical Studies,
Nick felt right at home teaching high school Government and U.S.
History. “The thrill of seeing kids learn is indescribable. I will
always treasure my classroom time”, Nick has often been heard saying.
Wanting
to see American Democracy up close, Nick then went to our nations Capital.
There he became a senior Congressional aide to Congressman Gary Ackerman
(NY). Working for a leading member of the Congress who was assigned to the
International Relations and Banking Committees, Nick studied at the
knee of legislative giants. At one time or another, Nick's portfolio
included foreign affairs, economic development, tax issues and trade
policy. "Working with Congressman Ackerman to relocate Balkan area
refugees fleeing ethnic cleansing was extraordinarily rewarding. I also
had the chance to assist many small businesses. Helping American business
people and seeing them actually go away with a smile on their face
was a highlight for me."
Nick moved to San Diego in order to attend the University of San
Diego's law and business schools. There
he graduated with both his Law degree and a Masters Degree in Business
Administration in three years. Called again to public service, Nick became
a Criminal Law Clerk at the Department of Justice, United
States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California. There he
was assigned to the major frauds
and economic crimes section and aided federal prosecutorial and
investigative teams as they probed Metabolife and Peregrine.
Continuing
to serve the public, Nick next went to work for the City Attorney of San
Diego as a Criminal Prosecutor. There he reviewed, charged, arraigned and
went to trial on hundreds of criminal matters, including; weapons and drug
possession, burglary, domestic violence, child abuse, forgery and fraud in
public contracting. "The duty of a prosecutor is seeking the truth.
Those in law enforcement have a sacred obligation not only to protect our
communities and punish wrongdoing, but to uphold the Constitution and the
rule of law." Nick believes in our Constitution and its guarantees of
due process and equal protection.
“I
am running for Congress because I was asked by the community that I live
in to once again enter public service. This is a critical time, a time to
renew the vision and promise of the Founding Fathers."
If you receive the endorsement
of Progressive Democrats of America, how do you intend to use it?
Please list the top three
issues on which you will take leadership if elected:
Do you agree with Congress’
decision to reauthorize the Patriot Act?
Why or why not?
If elected, which committee(s)
would you prefer to serve on and why?
Federal Issues:
1)
Iraq
:
PDA supports an immediate start to a rapid and
complete withdrawal from
Iraq
of all troops and military contractors, and has championed legislation
that would withhold funding for any other military purpose there. In
addition, PDA believes that the U.S. must revise its strategy for the
region by removing these forces from the Mideast entirely, rather than
just "redeploying" them within the region. PDA advocates a shift
in U.S. foreign policy from reckless unilateralism toward cooperation and
diplomacy--so that people of other countries know us more by our helping
hand than our slugging arm. Furthermore, PDA supports the redirecting of
resources allocated for military spending to human needs.
Will you pledge to support such
immediate and total withdrawal from Iraq of the military forces, including
supporting legislation towards this goal?
Each and every day that we
remain in Iraq we compromise our national security that much further. I
support a timely and responsible withdrawal from Iraq. The amount of money
that we have spent in Iraq
has hit $500 BILLION! That equates to…$275 million per day and $4,100
per household. I believe that
money should have been spent providing health care
to all American citizens; repairing our crumbling infrastructure, and;
shoring up Social Security and Medicare.
In addition, will you forswear
any preemptive military attacks upon any
nation?
Will you commit to fully support
investigations into the White House's false
claims justifying the invasion of
Iraq
, and would you support impeachment of Bush, Cheney and other
administration officials for these and other high crimes?
Have you participated in or
spoken at any events, demonstrations, meetings or teach-ins opposing the
Iraq war and occupation?
Have you organized any such
events?
2) Health Care:
There are over 46 million uninsured people living in
America, the majority of which are working Americans. Every year, nearly
18,000 people die unnecessarily as a direct result of their lack of health
insurance. Millions, with health insurance, maintain inadequate, overly
expensive coverage and face the peril of denials of claims or termination
of benefits if a family member becomes seriously ill--one of the leading
causes of bankruptcy in the U.S. While spending twice as much on health
care as any other industrialized country, our system performs poorly,
spending more money for less coverage, maximizing profits by finding ways
to deny care. The private insurance bureaucracy expends one-third of
health care money on waste, administrative paperwork, advertising and
corporate profits. The current Medicare program for senior citizens spends
under 4% of its budget for its overhead costs. Meanwhile, poor health,
escalating health insurance premiums and spiraling health care costs
impair our economy and job creation in the U.S.
PDA has endorsed HR 676, the National Health Insurance/"Expanded and
Improved Medicare-for-All" Act. To guarantee comprehensive health
care for all, PDA supports the replacement of the current profit-driven
system, publicly financed, privately provided health care program. This
"Medicare for All" national plan would save more than $350
billion per year, enough new money to provide guaranteed comprehensive
health care for all. This system would insure portable and uniform
benefits regardless of income. With no deductibles or co-pays, this plan
would encourage preventive care and restore a doctor and patient
controlled health care system affording choice of providers and fair,
publicly negotiated payment for both treatment and medication.
What is your approach to the
health care crisis?
I
believe that every American family should have access to a family doctor
of their choosing. We can and
must make this a reality! Concrete steps can be taken to move in that
direction. First, the health care
industry must adopt information technology. This will steam line
operations, cut down on medical errors
and help ferret out abuse and fraud. Secondly, the United States
government must use its bargaining
power to secure the best deals from the pharmaceutical industry. Every
other major industrial power does it and we must stop corporations from
controlling the negotiations. Lastly, we must rein in the insurance
companies & HMO’s concerning catastrophic care and/or end of life
treatment. We spend an
overwhelming majority of our health care dollars on the last year of life.
Insurance companies & HMO’s
should not be allowed to collect years worth of premiums and then abandon
American families during those closing days.
What is your view of Guaranteed
Health Care through an Expanded and Improved Medicare-for-All system?
If elected, would you support a publicly financed, privately provided
national health care program, which insures access to comprehensive health
care for all in the U.S.?
Would you support a not-for-profit, doctor-patient controlled system which
would eliminate the private health insurance industry (with protection for
eliminated workers) as the intermediary determining access and the level
of care?
Would you support the government's ability to negotiate fair prices for
treatment as well as drugs, as it does for those covered by the Veteran's
Administration's plan?
3) Economic Justice:
The current generation has seen unprecedented levels of economic
disparity, both among individuals (the richest 1% of Americans own almost
35% of all wealth; the bottom half, only 2.5%) and in the ratio of CEO pay
to employee wages.Thirty-seven million people (equal to the population of
California) are living in poverty in the U.S. These immoral levels of
poverty, which disproportionate impact communities of color and women, can
be significantly reduced through concerned legislative effort - including
a living wage for all workers, expanded earned income tax credits,
childcare assistance and housing vouchers. Specifically, the federal
government must fulfill its promise of resources to Hurricane Katrina
survivors so they can return to rebuild their communities in the Gulf
Coast.
Tax
burdens on the middle class can be eased if the wealthy pay their share.
In addition to working to roll back Bush's tax breaks for the wealthy, PDA
endorses the Equity in Income Act, limiting the amount of CEO compensation
afforded federal corporate tax deductions. In emphatically supporting the
workers' right to organize, we
also endorse the Employee Free Choice Act, which establishes unions in any
workplace where a majority of workers sign union cards to join. In the
global arena, PDA supports
anti-sweatshop legislation and fair trade agreements which protect
workers' rights as well as the environment, while opposing wage-reducing
"free trade" agreements that protect only corporate rights to
exploit unprotected labor. PDA also advocates for humane and comprehensive
immigration reform, which insures a fair, attainable path to citizenship
and the rights of undocumented workers in the workplace, affirming the
dignity and integrity of immigrant families.
What is your position on
"Fair Trade" versus "Free Trade" agreements?
I
support “fair trade” agreements that take into account America’s
interests and values. Much like
Senator Sherrod Brown, I oppose fast track authority for the President. As
a practicing attorney, I find
the statute in question to be Constitutionally dubious and an infringement
upon the Legislative chamber’s prerogatives.
Will you have pledge to reverse
the tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans?
All
American’s should pay their fair share of taxes. Justice Oliver Wendell
Holmes once famously
quipped that taxes are the price we pay to live in a civilized
society…and that includes the wealthy.
Do you support the right of
workers to organize, in any situation?
What is your relationship to
labor nationally and in your district?
Do you have union endorsements
and supporters in your district?
What is your approach to
bringing communities "out of poverty"?
Would you support the
legislation of the "out of poverty" caucus?
What efforts would you support
to provide meaningful resources to Katrina survivors?
Do you support comprehensive and
humane immigration reform as outlined above?
Have you reached out to
immigrant communities and advocates in your district?
4) Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections:
The
U.S. election system is in crisis. Not only are the usual corrupting
factors of money and corporate lobbying as rampant as perhaps at any time
in U.S. history, but the new millennium – along with the fallout from
the contested 2000 election - have ushered in a qualitative change in the
conduct of our elections: Centuries of tradition in which citizens,
government officials and Party representatives oversaw physical evidence
of voter intent have fallen to the rise of the machines. This sea change,
from paper to ephemeral electrons, brings much more than the implicit
demand to trust the invisible: the move to computers means that 85% of
America has ceded control of its elections to third-party vendors, whose
legal claims regarding proprietary software bring corporate control of the
entire voting process. PDA thus supports federal legislation that would
ban the use of touch-screen (“DRE”) voting machines.
Will
you pledge, if elected, to support only voting methods in which ballots
are cast on paper?
Do you pledge to support “Clean Money” public financing of public
elections?
In
my estimation the ONLY way to bring about fundamental change is to move to
a publicly financed
campaign system. If you wish to change American democracy whole cloth, you
must be willing to say that money does not equate to speech. If you wish
to engage in a real dialogue about universal health care,
you must remove the millions of dollars that the HMO's and insurance lobby
put to work via
Congressional campaigns. If we as a society wish to embrace a real and
sustainable agenda concerning
energy policy and the environment, we must say to Exxon-Mobile, B.P. and
the rest of the fossil fuel
industry that they do not get to distort the process with outsized
campaign contributions. If we ever
intend on fundamentally changing our military/foreign policy (and
procurement), the only way that this
will be accomplished is to rein in Boeing, McDonald Douglas, Raytheon and
their supporting companies.
Would
you accept public financing for your current campaign?
Do you support the restoration of voting rights to past felony offenders?
Do you support same-day voting registration?
Would you oppose the onerous requirement of official photo identification
before affording citizens access to the polls?
5) Environment/ Global
Warming:
No issue reveals more clearly the flaws of the U.S. political-economic
system than global warming - the dominance of greed and corporate power
over the public good, and the near-sighted focus on the short-term over
the welfare of future generations. It is known that the U.S. has the
natural resources to power the entire country solely from clean,
“alternative” sources of power- whether with solar cells that would
require a miniscule fraction of the California desert, or from wind
turbines on the Great Plains and in the Great Lakes. It has also often
been said that we need a new Apollo Program for clean energy (if not
Manhattan Project), in which science, industry and government would
cooperate on a crash course to produce novel results in a limited period. Immediate
action would include raising the auto fuel economy and impose mandatory
caps on carbon pollution while investing in public transportation, energy
conservation technologies and alternative energy development--in the
process, creating new jobs which pay well. .
PDA calls on the Democratic majority in Congress to lead boldly in
reducing our country's oil dependence and use of fossil fuels.
Will you pledge to take an uncompromising leadership role on legislation
to enact the enormous changes and sacrifices that will be required to stem
Global Warming?
The scientific debate as it concerns
global warming is over. It is now time for America’s elected officials
to address the gathering storm and to take proactive measures to mitigate
global warming. Congress
must take action to increase CAFÉ standards (further), move to a cap on
emissions and invest in green technology.
Will you pledge to enact
an Apollo Program for clean energy?
What kind of personal vehicle do you currently drive? Is it rated ZEV, or
PZEV?
Local Issue:
Blackwater
has initiated the establishment a training camp in Potrero CA.
Congressman Bob Filner has come out in full opposition to this
camp. What will you do
specifically to support him in keeping Blackwater out of San Diego County?
What
is your position on using military contractors in our military actions
abroad?
In
our cities, such as New Orleans?
On
our border?
Finance:
Please estimate your campaign costs:
Primary Election: ___________
General Election: ___________
How much money have you raised to date?
Raised to date: Approx. $250,000
Cash
on Hand: Approx. $200,000
Please list independent
expenditures that may impact your race:
*
Nick Liebham's Original Documents (from
pdf to word)
PDA SAN DIEGO BIO
Candidate
Name: Nick Leibham
Address:
2240 Encinitas Blvd.
, Ste D-111
Encinitas
,
CA
92024
E-mail
address: nick@picknick08.com
Office
for which you are running: US Congress, 50th District of California
Date
of Election: June 3rd, 2008
Registered
Political Party: Democrat
Campaign
Manager: Alec Evans Phone: 858-427-4804
Campaign
Address:
2240 Encinitas Blvd
Ste D-111
Encinitas
,
CA
92024
Additional Information:
Raised
to date: Approx. $250,000
Cash
on Hand: Approx. $200,000
Nick is a practicing attorney here in
San Diego
’s
North
County
. He’s your neighbor and a contributing member of our community. Born
and raised in
Oregon
, he attended college in
Hawaii
. Upon graduating Nick felt the calling of the classroom; graduating cum
laude with a B.A. in Political and Historical Studies, Nick felt right at
home teaching high school Government and U.S. History. “The thrill of
seeing kids learn is indescribable. I will always treasure my classroom
time”, Nick has often been heard saying.
Wanting
to see American Democracy up close, Nick then went to our nations Capital.
There he became a senior Congressional aide to Congressman Gary Ackerman
(NY). Working for a leading member of the Congress who was assigned to the
International Relations and Banking Committees, Nick studied at the knee
of legislative giants. At one time or another, Nick's portfolio included
foreign affairs, economic development, tax issues and trade policy.
"Working with Congressman Ackerman to relocate Balkan area refugees
fleeing ethnic cleansing was extraordinarily rewarding. I also had the
chance to assist many small businesses. Helping American business people
and seeing them actually go away with a smile on their face was a
highlight for me."
Nick
moved to
San Diego
in order to attend the
University
of
San Diego
's law and business schools. There he graduated with both his Law degree
and a Masters Degree in Business Administration in three years. Called
again to public service, Nick became a Criminal Law Clerk at the
Department of Justice, United States Attorney's Office for the Southern
District of California. There he was assigned to the major frauds and
economic crimes section and aided federal prosecutorial and investigative
teams as they probed Metabolife and Peregrine.
Continuing
to serve the public, Nick next went to work for the City Attorney of San
Diego as a Criminal Prosecutor. There he reviewed, charged, arraigned and
went to trial on hundreds of criminal matters, including; weapons and drug
possession, burglary, domestic violence, child abuse, forgery and fraud in
public contracting. "The duty of a prosecutor is seeking the truth.
Those in law enforcement have a sacred obligation not only to protect our
communities and punish wrongdoing, but to uphold the Constitution and the
rule of law." Nick believes in our Constitution and its guarantees of
due process and equal protection.
“I
am running for Congress because I was asked by the community that I live
in to once again enter public service. This is a critical time, a time to
renew the vision and promise of the Founding Fathers."
1. End the War & Redirect Funding. Each and every day that we
remain in
Iraq
we compromise our national security that much further. I support a timely
and responsible withdrawal from
Iraq
. The amount of money that we have spent in
Iraq
has hit $500 BILLION! That equates to…$275 million per day and $4,100
per household. I believe that money should have been spent providing
health care
to all American citizens; repairing our crumbling infrastructure, and;
shoring up Social Security and Medicare.
2. Health Care for All. I believe
that every American family should have access to a family doctor of their
choosing. We can and must make this a reality! Concrete steps can be taken
to move in that direction. First, the health care industry must adopt
information technology. This will steam line operations, cut down on
medical errors and help ferret out abuse and fraud. Secondly, the
United States
government must use its bargaining power to secure the best deals from the
pharmaceutical industry. Every other major industrial power does it and we
must stop corporations from controlling the negotiations. Lastly, we must
rein in the insurance companies & HMO’s concerning catastrophic care
and/or end of life treatment. We spend an overwhelming majority of our
health care dollars on the last year of life. Insurance companies &
HMO’s should not be allowed to collect years worth of premiums and then
abandon American families during those closing days.
3.
Economic Justice. All American’s should pay their fair share of
taxes. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once famously quipped that taxes are
the price we pay to live in a civilized society…and that includes the
wealthy. I support “fair trade” agreements that take into account
America
’s interests and values. Much like Senator Sherrod Brown, I oppose fast
track authority for the President. As a practicing attorney, I find the
statute in question to be Constitutionally dubious and an infringement
upon the Legislative chamber’s prerogatives.
4.
Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections. In my estimation the ONLY way
to bring about fundamental change is to move to a publicly financed
campaign system. If you wish to change American democracy whole cloth, you
must be willing to say that money does not equate to speech. If you wish
to engage in a real dialogue about universal health care, you must remove
the millions of dollars that the HMO's and insurance lobby put to work via
Congressional campaigns. If we as a society wish to embrace a real and
sustainable agenda concerning energy policy and the environment, we must
say to Exxon-Mobile, B.P. and the rest of the fossil fuel industry that
they do not get to distort the process with outsized campaign
contributions. If we ever intend on fundamentally changing our
military/foreign policy (and procurement), the only way that this will be
accomplished is to rein in Boeing, McDonald Douglas, Raytheon and their
supporting companies.
5.
Stop Global Warming. The scientific debate as it concerns global
warming is over. It is now time for
America
’s elected officials to address the gathering storm and to take
proactive measures to mitigate global warming. Congress must take action
to increase CAFÉ standards (further), move to a cap on emissions and
invest in green technology.
PDA SAN DIEGO QUESTIONS
PDA
Metro Chapter –
San Diego
2008
Candidate Questionnaire, 50th Congressional
District
To Whom It May Concern:
I am seeking PDA’s endorsement because I think it is crucial to my
success in November 2008. While the Democratic Congressional Campaign
Committee (DCCC) has recognized me as one of the top 40 challenger races
nationwide, I am
not running for DC – I am running for the people of the 50th
District and because I want to be
proud of my government again. I am confident that you will find not only
my stands on the issues to be satisfactory, but that my campaign will
instill confidence going into the Fall of 2008.
I
meet all the requirements as specified within the PDA’s governing
endorsement document, the Progressive Democrats of America National
Congressional Endorsement Policy. Under Section II (D), I must: (a) be
a member of the Democratic Party running on the Democratic Party ticket;
(b) be a member in good standing of PDA at the National level, and
involved with the local chapter, and; (c) shall provide a written
statement or answers to a questionnaire submitted by the chapter to the
campaign based on PDA’s five priority issues.
The
five priority issues as outlined upon PDA’s national website appear
below. I will be happy to answer any and all questions concerning these
priorities on the 21st of
February. Again, I request PDA’s support…together, we will once again
be a beacon of hope both at home and abroad.
Sincerely,
S/ Nick Leibham
1.
End the War & Redirect Funding. Each and every day that we
remain in
Iraq
we compromise our national security that much further. I support a timely
and responsible withdrawal from
Iraq
. The amount of money that we have spent in
Iraq
has hit $500 BILLION! That equates to…$275 million per day and $4,100
per household. I believe that money should have been spent providing
health care to all American citizens; repairing our crumbling
infrastructure, and; shoring up Social Security and Medicare.
2.
Health Care for All. I believe that every American family should
have access to a family doctor of their choosing. We can and must make
this a reality! Concrete steps can be taken to move in that direction.
First, the health care industry must adopt information technology. This
will steam line operations, cut down on medical errors and help ferret out
abuse and fraud. Secondly, the
United States
government must use its bargaining power to secure the best deals from the
pharmaceutical industry. Every other major industrial power does it and we
must stop corporations from controlling the negotiations. Lastly, we must
rein in the insurance companies & HMO’s concerning catastrophic care
and/or end of life treatment. We spend an overwhelming majority of our
health care dollars on the last year of life. Insurance companies &
HMO’s should not be allowed to collect years worth of premiums and then
abandon American families during those closing days.
3.
Economic Justice. All American’s should pay their fair share of
taxes. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once famously quipped that taxes are
the price we pay to live in a civilized society…and that includes the
wealthy. I support “fair trade” agreements that take into account
America
’s interests and values. Much like Senator Sherrod Brown, I oppose fast
track authority for the President. As a practicing attorney, I find the
statute in question to be Constitutionally dubious and an infringement
upon the Legislative chamber’s prerogatives.
4.
Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections. In my estimation the ONLY way
to bring about fundamental change is to move to a publicly financed
campaign system. If you wish to change American democracy whole cloth, you
must be willing to say that money does not equate to speech. If you wish
to engage in a real dialogue about universal health care, you must remove
the millions of dollars that the HMO's and insurance lobby put to work via
Congressional campaigns. If we as a society wish to embrace a real and
sustainable agenda concerning energy policy and the environment, we must
say to Exxon-Mobile, B.P. and the rest of the fossil fuel industry that
they do not get to distort the process with outsized campaign
contributions. If we ever intend on fundamentally changing our
military/foreign policy (and procurement), the only way that this will be
accomplished is to rein in Boeing, McDonald Douglas, Raytheon and their
supporting companies.
5.
Stop Global Warming. The scientific debate as it concerns global
warming is over. It is now time for
America
’s elected officials to address the gathering storm and to take
proactive measures to mitigate global warming. Congress must take action
to increase CAFÉ standards (further), move to a cap on emissions and
invest in green technology.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
CA 52
_Vickie
Butcher-
PDA
Metro
San Diego
Chapter
2008
Endorsement Questionnaire
U.
S. House of Representatives
Return to:
Judy Hess
judyhess@gmail.com
j.hess@cox.net
and
Diane Shamis
Field@pdamerica.org
Please
fill out this form if you are interested in pursuing an endorsement by PDA
Metro
San Diego
Chapter. We are part of
Progressive Democrats of
America
, a nation- wide grassroots organization of 100,000 members that works
inside the Democratic Party and outside in movements for peace and
justice.
Please return this questionnaire by the deadline: Feb.14 , 2008.
Altering or deleting the questions on this form may lead to
disqualification.
Please note that your answers on this questionnaire may be made public. If
you need additional space to answer questions, please attach additional
pages to the questionnaire. If
you have any questions regarding this questionnaire, please contact judyhess@gmail.com
or call 619-421-6403.
Candidate and Campaign Information:
Candidate
Name: Vickie
Butcher
Address:
1906
Olivebrook Ct.
,
El Cajon
,
CA
92019
E-mail Address:
media@votevickiebutcher.com
Office
for which you are running: 52nd
Congressional District
Date
of Election: June
3, 2008
Registered
Political Party:
Democrat
Campaign
Manager: Patrick Pannett, DCI Group
Phone:
202-258-2311; (202)546-4242; 202-302-9185
mobile ppanett@dcigroup.com
Campaign
Consultant: Carl
Silverberg, Silverberg Associates,
Washington
D.C.
Phone: 202-320-9797
Fax: ?
Also:
Media & Communications Consultant: Miriam Raftery
619-698-7617;
fax 619-698-7628
Campaign
Address:
7400 El Cajon Blvd., Suite 203
,
La Mesa
,
CA
91941
List endorsements from organizations
and/or individuals:
Partial list:
Congresswoman
Stephanie Tubbs-Jones, chair,House Committee on Standards of Official
Conduct (Ethics committee)
Congresswoman Diane Watson
Sylvia Hampton, director, San Diego Healthcare for All/League of Women
Voters
Richard Barrera,
San Diego
Regional Organizer, United Healthcare Workers
Dan Ortiz, former vice president, United Auto Workers, local 4123
Leon Thompson
, Executive board representative,
California Democratic Party and Courage Campaign representative,
San Diego
Count
Derek Casady, former 52nd Congressional District Democratic
candidate and president,
Coronado
Democratic Club
Edi Montijo Chapman, former president, La Mesa-Foothills Democratic Club
and past president, National Women’s Political Caucus, San Diego chapter
Estela de Los Rios, Latino organizer
Paul Vauchelet, Painters & Allied Trades, District Council #36
Jamie Butler, chair,
California
Democratic Party Rural Caucus
Peter Moller
, retired news anchor, KOGO and
KSDO
Miriam Raftery, national award-winning journalist and media watch chair,
San Diego
For Democracy/DFA
Dee Sanford, founder, African American Business Women of Vision
Rev. Peter Moore-Kochlacs, former Democratic candidate, 52nd
Congressional district
Andre J. Branch, PhD, professor of educational curriculum,
San Diego
State
University
How would you describe yourself politically
(i.e. progressive; moderate democrat, etc.)?
progressive
List elective or political party offices
you have held, including committee appointments:
I
have held many political positions including:
City
& County Government
Chair,
El Cajon Planning Commission (12 year member)
Executive
Director, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Task Force,
San Diego
Appointed
member,
County
of
San Diego Human Relations Commission
African
American Community Dialogue Support Group
Member,
Children and Families First
City
of
El Cajon General Plan
and Residential Zones Committee
Consultant,
San Diego County Department of Health Services
Legal
assistant, Honorable Presiding Judge Elizabeth Riggs, El Cajon Municipal
Superior Court
Assistant
and governmental liaison to Chairman, San Diego County Board of
Supervisors
State
of
California
California
9th Regional Water Quality Control Board
California
State
Advisory Board on Drug Programs
National/Federal
Government
U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Molecular & Clinical Genetic
Devices Panel
Center
for Devices and Radiological Health, Consumer Representative
FDA
Consumer Consortium
What is your primary occupation?
I
was a teacher of the deaf and hard of hearing and also taught civics and
political science. I obtained
a law degree before pursuing a public service career.
Besides my government positions listed above, I have also headed up
many nonprofit and professional organizations.
I was president of the National Medical Association Auxiliary,
working to bring healthcare to underserved communities.
I have been president of
El Cajon
Rotary and the
San Diego
World Affairs Council. I
served on a United Nations Peacemaking roundtable, earning the Medaille
d’Excellence in
Geneva
Switzerland
. I am also founder and
executive director of Water for Children Africa, and received the 2007
NAACP Award in San Diego for leading
efforts to provide safe, clean water and medical supplies for people in 15
nations. I have also
received the March of Dimes Mother of the Year award and an FDA award for
my consumer service.
Why
are you running for Congress? (100 word limit)
People in our nation and my district are
hurting. We must end this war,
which costs $10 billion a month, reduce our staggering deficit and invest
in programs to help
people at home—such as universal healthcare
and “green collar” job training in sustainable energy production.
In addition, the worst wildfires in
California
history all started in my district. I
will provide leadership at the federal level to provide real protection
against wildfires and other natural disasters.
It is wrong for people to be left homeless by Katrina and wildfires
while our government neglects its role in protecting public safety.
Issues Specific to Office:
What experiences have prepared you to run
for Congress?
I have overcome adversity and spent my life
fighting for what is right. My grandfather was lynched by a brutal mob in
the South. My father was sent
away as a child to escape racial violence.
Inspired after
hearing Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. speak, I challenged segregation and
integrated a diner in my own community—long before the Civil Rights Act.
I fought to win civil rights and voting rights.
I have
devoted my life to public service, first as a teacher of the deaf, then as
a high school and college civics/political science teacher.
I graduated law school after my fifth child was born – and that
takes tenacity! I have held a
variety of public offices and led nonprofit organizations, gaining
leadership experience at the international, national, state and local
levels. I have also served as
a national delegate
at sustainability conferences in
Washington
D.C.
If
you receive the endorsement of Progressive Democrats of America, how do
you intend to use it?
I
will proudly list PDA’s endorsement to win votes from
San Diego
County
’s many progressive voters. If
there is funding from PDA, I will use it to send mailers and air radio ads
educating voters about the need
for change—including support for progressive issues.
My campaign will also use funds for signage, field organizing,
office, staffing and overhead costs as well as a massive voter
registration drive targeting new Democratic voters in populations of
diversity and youths.
Please list the top three issues on which
you will take leadership if elected:
1) Ending the
Iraq
War
2)
Enacting universal healthcare for all Americans
3)
Protecting my constituents from wildfires—and improving natural disaster
protections for all Americans
Do you agree with Congress’ decision to
reauthorize the Patriot Act? No.
Why
or why not?
The
Patriot Act is a violation of our constitutional rights and liberties. It
must be revisited, revised and/or repealed.
If elected, which committee(s) would you
prefer to serve on and why?
I
would be most interested in serving on the House Subcommittee on Labor,
Health and Human Services, and
Education, and/or on committees addressing
international and water issues.
I have expertise in healthcare reform, having served as president
of national, state and county medical organizations, as well
as on a hospital foundation board and several FDA medical panels.
I am also a teacher and have a strong interest in improving public
education. As founder and
executive director of Water for Children
Africa
, I have global water expertise as well as a strong interest in
international issues.
Federal Issues:
1)
Iraq
:
PDA
supports an immediate start to a rapid and complete withdrawal from
Iraq
of all troops and military contractors, and has championed legislation
that would withhold funding for any other military purpose there. In
addition, PDA believes that the
U.S.
must revise its strategy for the region by removing these forces from the
Mideast
entirely, rather than just "redeploying" them within the region.
PDA
advocates a shift in
U.S.
foreign policy from reckless
unilateralism toward cooperation and diplomacy--so that people of other
countries know us more by our helping hand than our slugging arm.
Furthermore, PDA supports the redirecting of resources allocated for
military spending to human needs.
Will
you pledge to support such immediate and total withdrawal from
Iraq
of the military forces, including supporting legislation towards this
goal?
Yes,
absolutely. It’s time to
bring our troops home.
In
addition, will you forswear any preemptive military attacks upon any
nation? Yes
Will
you commit to fully support investigations into the White House's false
claims justifying the invasion of Iraq, and would you support impeachment
of Bush, Cheney and other administration officials for these and other high crimes?
Impeachment
hearings should be convened whenever there is strong evidence that high
crimes and misdemeanors have been committed, and I would uphold those
principals for any high officials who
violate our Constitutional laws, although President Bush and Vice
President Cheney will no longer be
in office when I am sworn in along with a new President and Vice President
in 2009.
Have
you participated in or spoken at any events, demonstrations, meetings or
teach-ins opposing the
Iraq
war and occupation? Yes
Have
you organized any such events?
Yes,
I organized a Martin Luther King day commemoration and spoke about the
need to honor King’s
legacy of peace and end the
Iraq
War.
2)
Health Care:
There
are over 46 million uninsured people living in
America
, the majority of whom are working Americans. Every year, nearly 18,000
people die unnecessarily as a direct result of their lack of health
insurance.
Millions with health insurance, maintain inadequate, overly expensive
coverage and face the peril of denials of claims or termination of
benefits if a family member becomes seriously ill--one of the leading
causes of bankruptcy in the
U.S.
While spending twice as much on health care as any other industrialized
country, our system performs poorly, spending more money for less
coverage, maximizing profits by finding ways to deny care. The private
insurance bureaucracy expends one-third of health care money on waste,
administrative paperwork, advertising and
corporate profits. The current Medicare program for senior citizens
spends under 4% of its budget for its overhead costs. Meanwhile, poor
health, escalating health insurance premiums and spiraling health care
costs impair our economy and job creation in the U.S.
PDA has endorsed HR 676, the National Health /"Expanded and Improved
Medicarefor-All" Act. To guarantee comprehensive health care for all,
PDA supports the replacement of the current
profit-driven system, publicly financed, privately provided health care
program. This "Medicare for All" national plan would save
more than $350 billion per year, enough new money to provide guaranteed
comprehensive health care for all. This system would insure portable and
uniform benefits regardless of income. With no deductibles or co-pays,
this plan would encourage preventive care and restore a doctor and patient
controlled health care system affording choice of providers and fair,
publicly negotiated payment for both treatment and medication.
What is your approach to the health care
crisis?
It’s
time for the
U.S.
to join all other industrialized nations in the world and enact universal
healthcare for all Americans, starting with our children.
Affordable healthcare should be a right, not a privilege.
What is your view of Guaranteed Health Care through an Expanded and
Improved Medicare-for-All system?
I would support giving all Americans a choice
to opt into a Medicare-for-All system with high-quality healthcare, while
allowing those who prefer to retain private coverage the option of
retaining it, similar to the program proposed by John Edwards.
Ideally I would hope to see all Americans offered access to the
same high quality healthcare that members of Congress have provided for
themselves.
If elected, would you support a publicly financed, privately provided
national health care program, which insures access to comprehensive health
care for all in the
U.S.
?
Yes, provided patients have freedom to choose
their providers, and that healthcare is affordable and
high quality to everyone. We
must also eliminate loopholes for companies to exclude people from care
due to pre-existing conditions etc. The
current system experiences a 30% administrative cost, which
drives up cost of care astronomically.
I would seek a cap on administrative costs to improve efficiency
and assure that the lion’s share of funds go to patient care, not
fattening profits for executive managers.
Would you support a not-for-profit,
doctor-patient controlled system which would eliminate the private
health insurance industry (with protection for eliminated workers) as
the intermediary determining access and the level of care?
I support a public system that would cover
all Americans who opt to participate.
However it is most
realistic to structure a system that allows choice for all Americans,
reflecting our democratic values.
Would you support the government's ability to negotiate fair prices for
treatment as well as drugs, as it does for those covered by the Veteran's
Administration's plan?
Yes,
absolutely.
3)
Economic Justice:
The
current generation has seen unprecedented levels of economic disparity,
both among individuals (the richest 1% of Americans own almost 35% of all
wealth; the bottom half, only
2.5%)
and in the ratio of CEO pay to employee wages. Thirty-seven million people
(equal to the population of
California
) are living in poverty in the
U.S.
These immoral levels of poverty, which
disproportionately impact communities of color and women, can be
significantly reduced through concerned legislative effort - including a
living wage for all workers, expanded earned income tax credits, childcare
assistance and housing vouchers. Specifically,
the federal government must fulfill its promise of resources to Hurricane
Katrina survivors so they can return to rebuild their communities in the
Gulf
Coast
.
Tax burdens on the middle class can be eased if the wealthy pay their
share. In addition to working to roll back Bush's tax breaks for the
wealthy, PDA endorses the Equity in Income Act, limiting
the amount of CEO compensation afforded federal corporate tax deductions.
In emphatically supporting the workers' right to organize, we also endorse
the Employee Free Choice Act, which establishes unions in any workplace
where a majority of workers
sign union cards to join.
In the global arena, PDA supports anti-sweatshop legislation and fair
trade agreements which protect workers' rights as well as the environment,
while opposing wage reducing "free trade" agreements that
protect only corporate rights to exploit unprotected labor.
PDA also advocates for humane and comprehensive immigration reform, which
insures a fair, attainable path to citizenship and the rights of
undocumented workers in the workplace, affirming the dignity and integrity
of immigrant families.
What is your position on "Fair
Trade" versus "Free Trade" agreements?
It’s
imperative that future trade agreements must include labor and
environmental standards to level the playing field for American workers
and provide protections for workers in other countries, as well as
protecting our environment. The
outsourcing of American jobs overseas must be stemmed.
I support the fair trade concept.
I have organized international trade conferences enabling American
small businesses
to gain knowledge through the
U.S.
Department of Commerce and open up trade opportunities that also provide
farmers and producers of products fair compensation.
Will
you have pledge to reverse the tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans?
Yes.
It is immoral for Bush to seek permanent tax cuts for millionaires while
so many poor and middle class Americans are struggling to make ends meet.
We need a tax stimulus program that benefits working Americans,
seniors, and those who don’t earn enough to file income taxes in order
to jump-start our economy and help those most in need.
Do you support the right of workers to organize, in any situation?
I
grew up in a working class family, and fully support the rights of
workers. The Bush
administration has turned a blind eye to union-busting practices and has
failed to enforce laws that protect workers’ rights to organize.
It’s wrong for large corporations like Wal-Mart to fire workers
who seek to organize unions. I
support the Employee Free Choice Act introduced by Senator Kennedy and
Rep. Miller, which would require that employers honor decisions made by a
majority of workers to form a labor union.
What is your relationship to labor nationally
and in your district?
I
have been endorsed by several union leaders.
My campaign manager is a union activist, and I am
applying for endorsement from the San Diego-Imperial Counties Labor
Council.
Do you have union endorsements and supporters in your district?
Union
endorsement applications are pending, but I have been endorsed by 3 major
labor union leaders and have support from other prominent members of labor
groups.
What is your approach to bringing communities
"out of poverty"?
This
is an important and complex issue. Poverty in my district has increased
sharply under the Bush administration.
The cost of healthcare, housing, gasoline and college are making it
harder and harder to survive, while jobs get outsourced overseas. We must
have access to affordable healthcare for all Americans.
We need job development and training in jobs with good wages, such
as “green collar” jobs in renewable energy production—helping our
people, our economy, and our environment.
We should enforce laws protecting workers rights to organize. We
must take action to lift children out of poverty and provide healthcare
for every child, starting with approving the S-CHIP program that President
Bush vetoed. We should
strengthen public education, provide more vocational training programs,
and make college
affordable for all deserving students. We also need tax relief for the
poorest Americans, as well as
predatory lending laws and economic reforms to help save people from
losing their homes to foreclosure.
Would you support the legislation of the
"out of poverty" caucus?
I
have not seen the legislation yet that this caucus proposes, but I am an
admirer and friend of Congresswoman Barbara Lee, founder of the Out of
Poverty Caucus. We have traveled to Africa together and share a deep
concern to help lift people out of poverty, both in the
U.S.
and globally. I would be be likely to support all reasonable legislation
proposed by the Caucus.
What efforts would you support to provide meaningful resources to Katrina
survivors?
We
need more funding for cleanup and rebuilding
New Orleans
and other hard-hit areas in the
Gulf
Coast
region, as well as rebuilding levees to higher standards.
I would be open to other proposals to provide long-overdue help for
survivors of both Hurricane Katrina and Rita.
Do you support comprehensive and humane immigration reform as outlined
above?
Yes.
We must provide humane policies including a path to citizenship for
law-abiding immigrants working here, along with reasonable border
protection policies. We must
also work to halt hate crimes and hate speech on talk radio, which is
fueling racism and violence toward immigrants.
Have you reached out to immigrant communities and advocates in your
district?
Yes,
in fact I was just interviewed on Latino radio by Enrique Morones,
organizer of the national immigrant marches.
We are doing massive outreach to the Latino community including
organizing voter registration drives, and translating our materials into
Spanish.
4) Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections:
The
U.S.
election system is in crisis. Not only are the usual corrupting factors of
money and corporate lobbying as rampant as perhaps at any time in U.S.
history, but the new millennium along with the fallout from the contested
2000 election - have ushered in a qualitative change in the conduct of our
elections: Centuries of tradition in which citizens, government officials
and Party representatives oversaw physical evidence of voter intent have
fallen to the rise of the machines. This sea change, from paper to
ephemeral electrons, brings much more than the implicit demand to trust
the invisible: the move to computers means that 85% of
America
has ceded control of its elections to third-party vendors, whose legal
claims regarding proprietary software bring corporate control of the
entire voting process. PDA thus supports federal legislation that would
ban the use of touch-screen (“DRE”) voting machines.
Will you pledge, if elected, to support only voting methods in which
ballots are cast on paper?
Yes, this is very important to me.
I fought hard to win voting rights and civil rights, and will also
pledge to fight to have every vote counted accurately.
Do you pledge to support “Clean
Money” public financing of public elections?
Yes
Would you accept public financing for your current campaign?
Probably,
particularly if my opponents would agree to this as well so that we would
have a level playing field.
Do you support the restoration of voting rights to past felony offenders?
Yes,
I believe if a person has served their time and repaid their debt to a
society, is no longer on parole and is prepared to accept the
responsibilities of citizenship, then they should be allowed to have a
vote. I am concerned about the
high disenfranchisement rate particularly among African-American voters on
this basis.
California
has already restored voting rights for paroled felons from state prisons;
it’s time for our federal government to follow suit.
Do you support same-day voting
registration?
Probably;
I would want to see studies on whether there was any substantial increase
in fraud wherever this has been tried before, but the concept makes sense
to maximize voter turnout and participation.
I would also support voting on weekends to encourage higher voter
turnout.
Would you oppose the onerous requirement of official photo identification
before affording citizens access to the polls?
Yes
5)
Environment/ Global Warming:
No
issue reveals more clearly the flaws of the
U.S.
political-economic system than global warming - the dominance of greed and
corporate power over the public good, and the nearsighted focus on the
short-term over the welfare of future generations.
It is known that the U.S. has the natural resources to power the entire
country solely from clean, “alternative” sources of power- whether
with solar cells that would require a miniscule fraction of the California
desert, or from wind turbines on the Great Plains and in the Great Lakes.
It has also often been said that we need a new Apollo Program for clean
energy (if not Manhattan Project), in which science, industry
and government would cooperate on a crash course to produce novel results
in a limited period. Immediate action would include raising the auto fuel
economy and impose mandatory caps on carbon pollution while investing in
public transportation, energy conservation technologies and alternative
energy development--in the process, creating new jobs, which pay well.
PDA calls on the Democratic majority in
Congress to lead boldly in reducing our country's oil dependence and use
of fossil fuels.
Will you pledge to take an uncompromising
leadership role on legislation to enact the enormous changes and
sacrifices that will be required to stem Global Warming?
Yes,
absolutely. I have been a delegate several times to a national conference
on sustainability in
Washington
D.C.
As a global expert on
water issues through Water for Children
Africa
, I am well aware of the devastating impact of global warming and believe
strong, swift actions are needed to address this serious threat.
Will you pledge to enact an Apollo Program for clean energy?
Yes,
I support the Apollo Program.
What kind of personal vehicle do you currently drive? Is it rated ZEV, or
PZEV?
I
currently drive a
Toyota
van but hope to purchase a hybrid as my next vehicle.
Local Issue:
Blackwater
has initiated the establishment a training camp in
Potrero
,
CA
. Congressman Bob Filner has
come out in full opposition to this camp.
What will you do specifically to
support him in keeping Blackwater out of
San Diego
County
?
I
would support Congressman Filner’s bill to restrict military contractors
to military bases or other federal property,
but I would go farther. I do
not believe our country should be outsourcing military jobs to private
contractors, particularly
one with a record of violence and
unaccountability such as Blackwater’s.
I also believe Blackwater should be held accountable for its
actions, and would oppose further federal contracts with this company.
Blackwater
does not belong in San Diego County and particularly, not in Potrero. We
must be sensitive to the devastation in this community from the recent
Harris wildfire and should not allow Blackwater with its armory, shooting
ranges and vehicle training track, all of which pose fire risks to the
community.
What is your position on using military contractors in our military
actions abroad?
I
am deeply disturbed by the lack of accountability of these private
contractors and believe we should revisit our country’s policies to
eliminate any “need” for such contractors.
When we send our troops overseas for three or four deployments, we
are stretching our military forces too thin.
Now our government is pulling people out of hospitals, even for
treatment of severe conditions including bipolar disorder, homicidal and
suicidal tendencies and sending them back to
Iraq
. We are woefully short of
personnel and our soldiers are paying the price.
But turning to unaccountable private contractors is not the
answer—particularly contractors with records of abuses.
The role of security and other vital functions should be filled by
American military personnel, not contractors unaccountable under federal
law.
In our cities, such as
New Orleans
?
This
should be the role of our National Guard, not private military
contractors.
On our border?
I
would never support privatization of our Border Patrol.
Finance:
Please
estimate your campaign costs:
Primary Election: $100,000 General
Election: $400,000
How
much money have you raised to date?
Around
$24,000.
I
entered the race late and raised $10,000 in just a few weeks over the
holiday season. I have many
fundraising resources and expect to surpass my primary opponents in
funding in the near future. This
week, I’ve added a national campaign
manager, Patrick Pannett, who has had
leadership roles in the Kerry-Edwards presidential campaign and other
federal races. He is focusing on bringing in national funding from
prominent, predominantly progressive sources.
Please list independent expenditures that may
impact your race:
None that I’m aware of currently.
_____________________________________________
PDA Metro Meeting:
When:
Thursday,
Mar. 20 6pm
supper/ 7pm meeting
Where:
Giovanni's Pizza (corner
Clairemont Mesa Blvd
and Ruffin Rd. San Diego)
What:
Did you
know?
That
San Diego
County's Elections
are run by:
Former
Diebold Sales Executive
(Registrar, Deborah Seiler)
Former
Cuyahoga
County Ohio
Registrar, two members of whose
staff were convicted in the 2004
Ohio Presidential Election Scandal?
(Assistant Registrar, Michael Vu)
How
to elect Progressive Democrats and take back our country?
Come
to our meeting to find out!
Hear
Julian
Quinonez (SD
Co. Dem Party) discuss the Go Team
efforts - and how to become a Precinct Leader and Poll Watcher -
help progressive candidates get elected.
Hear
Sal
Magallanez
on working Election Integrity by poll watching
We
got Blackwater out - we can
fix our elections and get a
Progressive
Democratic Majority in - Si se puede!
_________________________________________________________________________________________
PDA
Metro Endorses and will Participate in
SDCPJ's
March 15 Rally and March
commemorating
the Illegal Invasion of Iraq Mar.
19, 2003
The
occupation continues...
Join us at our PDA
Metro Table
11:15 at
TerAlta Park
(bordered by 40th St, Orange Ave, Central Ave and Polk St)
We'll
assemble there to
go to the March together
and march behind our banner.
Bring
signs, drums (substitute pots
and wooden spoons)
and wear your PDA T Shirt to demonstrate
our solidarity in opposing this war!
March will return to TerAlta Park for 1 pm Rally with
Featured Speaker,
Gore Vidal
Directions to TerAlta
Park
TerAlta is either directly below or above I-15 - hard to be sure from the map.
If you get off I-15 North at El Cajon Blvd. (highly recommended) go West (left) on El Cajon Blvd, and almost immediately go South (left) on 40th. Orange Ave. is 1 block south of El Cajon Blvd. Turn left on Orange to drive the northern border of the park and then you can circle it to find parking.
If you're coming from 15-South, go west (right) on El Cajon Blvd and then follow the above directions.
____________________________________________
PDA
Metro San Diego Proudly Presents:
!!! ENDORSED
CANDIDATES !!!
CA 53
MIKE COPASS
Click on Mike's picture to
see his story on the
National
Website
CA
50
CHERYL EDE
And Presenting Our First
Nationally Endorsed
Candidate this year, in
CA 52
VICKIE BUTCHER
See Vickie's Front Page Story at PDA National:
http://www.pdamerica.org/articles/campaigns/2008-03-03-13-06-01-campaigns.php
Information: All 3 Candidates have won the Endorsement of
our Chapter. To
receive the National Endorsement, the
Candidates participate in the National
Conference Call, "Inside the
Democratic Party", the 4th Thursday of each
month.
Candidate
Vickie Butcher
has won the National Endorsement in last month's call.
Mike Copass and Cheryl
Ede will be on the call
Thursday, March 27. All PDA
members are invited to be on the
call. See the National Home page for call
information.
___________________________________________
Candidate Endorsement Meeting
Feb.
29
Hear Mike Copass for
Congress in CA 53
Giovanni's at 6pm Supper -
6:30 pm Registration - 7:00 pm Meeting
Here are Mike's
Responses!
CA 53
PDA
Metro
San Diego
Chapter
2008
Candidate Endorsement Questionnaire
U. S. House of Representatives
Return to:
Judy Hess, Leader
j.hess@cox.net
Diane
Shamis, PDA
diane@pdamerica.org
Please fill out this form if
you are interested in pursuing an endorsement by PDA Metro
San Diego
. We are part of Progressive Democrats of
America
, a nationwide grassroots organization of 100,000 members that
works inside the Democratic Party and outside in movements for
peace and justice.
Please return this questionnaire by the Deadline:
Feb. 22 2008
Altering or deleting the questions on this form may lead to
disqualification. Please
note that your answers on this questionnaire may be made public.
Please answer on this form in the space below the question.
Use as much space as you need. Feel free to change font
and/or color to distinguish your answers.
If you have any questions regarding
this questionnaire, please contact Judy Hess, 619-421-6403.
Candidate
and Campaign Information:
Candidate
Name:
Mike
Copass
Address:
4042
Mount Blackburn Ave
City,
State, Zip:
San
Diego
CA
92111
E-mail
Address: California53@gmail.com
Office
for which you are running: US
Congress, 53rd District,
California
Date
of Election: June
3, 2008
Registered
Political Party: Democratic
Party
Campaign
Manager:
N/A
Phone:
619.665.9415
Fax: N/A
Campaign
Consultant:
N/A Phone:
N/A
Fax: N/A
Campaign
Address: Copass
for Congress,
PO Box 125081
,
San Diego
CA
92112-0581
List endorsements from organizations and/or individuals:
Al
Meyerhoff (Environmental
lawyer and former Natural Resources Defense Council attorney)
I
have only recently begun asking for endorsements.
How
would you describe yourself politically (i.e. progressive;
moderate democrat, etc.)?
I
am a proud Progressive.
To quote the late Senator Paul Wellstone “I
stand for the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party”
List elective or political party offices you have held, including
committee appointments:
None.
(In addition, I have been neither wined, nor dined, by a lobbyist
or PAC, nor taken paid-for travel.)
What is your primary occupation?
I
am a scientific consultant to a plaintiffs’ law firm,
specializing in detecting and prosecuting securities
fraud perpetrated by pharmaceutical manufacturers alleged to have
violated Securities laws. I
created
and am the president of a legal services business which hires and
trains attorneys in the review and
analysis of discovery documents in similar complex civil
litigation matters. Additionally,
I write for the
Corporate
Governance Bulletin, a quarterly publication which highlights
litigation and advances in
securities and consumer fraud.
Why are you running for Congress? (100 word limit)
I
strongly believe that the
United States
must face multiple impending financial, ecological,
political
social crises, driven by a war machine and militarism that has
been vocally opposed by We, the People,
but yet unchallenged by the people's Congress. It is abundantly
clear that the status quo (and the
incumbent representative in our District) has failed utterly to
provide leadership in confronting these
crises. Americans can,
and will, boldly confront these challenges – and to do so, the
times call for change –
for a new approach and with a new voice.
Issues Specific to Office:
What experiences have prepared
you to run for Congress?
Patience:
I have 12 years of experience in molecular biology,
specifically microbiology and molecular
genetics, working in three
different countries, which has provided training in patience,
persistence,
(and languages) as well as providing an understanding
of genetic technologies. There are currently no members
of Congress with training in molecular biology, which is alarming,
given the rapid technological
development and genetically modified products entering our food
supply.
Business:
I manage a small business in Legal Services, which has been
instrumental in instructing me
how job creation, business, and regulation function.
Activism: I have served as a volunteer Point Person in the 53rd
Congressional District (
San Diego
)
since June, in which I brought the concerns of the progressive
community to the office of its Congressional
Representative. My
candidacy arises directly out of my experience with PDA, in
pursuing a meaningful
"inside and outside the Party"
strategy for change. I took my role as point person seriously,
reading and
studying the various House Resolutions under
consideration, and communicating the Representative's
votes and positions on key issues (
Iraq
, impeachment, and healthcare) back to the members of PDA.
If you receive the endorsement of Progressive Democrats of
America
, how do you intend to use it?
A PDA endorsement will be
invaluable to establishing awareness and excitement about a
new
Progressive candidate on both a local national level.
I will employ the PDA endorsement in a fashion
similar to that of Donna Edwards of
Maryland
, to reach out to other progressive political groups both
locally and nation-wide, and be proud to list the endorsement on
my literature, website and
communications.
Please
list the top three issues on which you will take leadership if
elected:
1) Ending
Iraq
war funding and returning troops home with full proper treatment.
I support the Lynn
Woolsey-sponsored HR 508, the Bring the Troops
home and Iraq Sovereignty Restoration, towards
restoring the
United States
’ standing in the world community.
2) Aggressively moving to address global climate change, through
integrating sound and sustainable
energy policy with carbon and climate policy, for both short term
and long term goals.
3) Implementing Universal Health Care in the
United States
(I support HR 676, cosponsored by
John Conyers and Dennis
Kucinich)
Do
you agree with Congress’ decision to reauthorize the Patriot
Act?
No.
We know now Patriot Act was a terrible idea, born of the
twin evils of fear and deception, and
based neither in facts nor
reflection.
As
a matter of principle, I oppose strongly all legislation that
undermines or eviscerates our
Constitutional rights -- from the
Patriot Act, to the creating of the Homeland Security Dept, the
Military Commission
Act, which suspends habeas corpus, and the attempts to pass
“Patriot Act II.” The
net effect of these
laws is not “better security” -- the Patriot Act and its
ill-conceived brethren instead exert an enormously
chilling effect
on free and open speech, and the ability of American citizens to
actively voice their dissent.
I
stand with Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul, who, although
of starkly differing positions on
social programs, have stood up
and spoken out-- with purpose and clarity --against the raft of
"anti-
freedom" legislations passed by Congress during the last
seven years, laws which are antithetical to the
basic freedoms and
liberties which generations of men and women fought to establish.
The newest
outrage is the revelation that Bush-Cheney have sought, even prior
to September 11th 2001, the
circumvention of the FISA court
standard, to harvest all electronic communications, voice and
data,
from American citizens engaged in private discourse – this
with the collaboration of the large telecom
corporations.
The
lifeblood of liberty is free and open discourse: in the street, on
the phone, on the internet. Legislation
that chills or suppresses this speech, or that permits spying
either overtly or covertly, eviscerates the
privacy protections of the 4th Amendment.
In Congress, I will support
legislation such as HR 3835, cosponsored by Kucinich and Welch,
which
addresses and repeals many of the abuses of executive power.
Why
or why not?
See details above.
If
elected, which committee(s) would you prefer to serve on and why?
The House Armed Services
Committee, in order support the human personnel serving in the
armed forces in
the mission of defense of the continental United
States, and to place a strong check on the interests that would
attempt to manipulate and abuse the awesome military power of the
United States to purposes that are inimical to
freedom – whether
for purposes of empire-building, or to expand for-profit oil
enterprises. We have learned the
lessons of Col Medley Butler, who
said (in 1933) "There are only two things we
should fight for. One is the defense
of our homes and the other is
the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a
racket." Having
been alerted
by our returning US military veterans regarding the
incredible
abuses of the
Iraq
invasion, we must stay ever-vigilant against the use of the Armed
Services for "war as
a racket." The restoration and rebuilding of the human
infrastructure of the men and women is our obligation.
As such, I would be honored to be called to serve on the
Oversight Subcommittee of the House Armed Services
Committee (HASC).
As a scientist who is keenly aware of the importance of scientific
data, and who has direct experience as a genetic
engineer, and
fully aware of both the incredible power for genetic technology to
be abused for private-profit purposes,
I would also be pleased to rise to the call to serve on the
Agricultural Committee. The
use, sale and consumption of
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO
foods) is a topic that should be part of a lively and informed
public debate.
I would similarly be glad to serve on the newly-established House
Select Committee on Energy
Independence and Global Warming.
Federal Issues:
1)
Iraq
:
PDA
supports an immediate start to a rapid and complete withdrawal
from
Iraq
of all troops and military contractors, and has championed
legislation that would withhold funding for any other military
purpose there. In addition, PDA believes that the
U.S.
must revise its strategy for the region by removing these forces
from the
Mideast
entirely, rather than just "redeploying" them within the
region. PDA advocates
a shift in
U.S.
foreign policy from reckless unilateralism toward cooperation and
diplomacy--so that people of other countries know us more by our
helping hand than our slugging arm. Furthermore, PDA supports the
redirecting of resources allocated for military spending to human
needs.
Will you pledge to support such
immediate and total withdrawal from
Iraq
of the military forces, including supporting legislation towards
this goal?
A priority for the 111th Congress must be the restoration of
America
’s standing in the world community.
America
’s strength lies not in its weaponry, but in the power of its
ideals. To that end, I
fully support legislation such as HR 508, Lynn Woolsey’s “Iraq
Sovereignty Restoration” Bill. The international community can
and will come together to
support the peaceful reconstruction of the nation of Iraq, and I
will support legislation those ends, while we
reconstruct our human military infrastructure both at home and
abroad by providing the services they may need.
In addition, will you forswear any preemptive military attacks
upon any nation?
I believe in Rule by Law.
The
framers of the Constitution understood that placing the power of
unilateral use of the military in the hands of one man, or in the
Executive Branch, was to invite the abuse of that power.
Therefore, Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution
describes that it is reserved to the Congress, and only to
Congress, the power to declare war and levy funds for that
purpose.
Pre-emptive military strikes fall dangerously close to what the
U.S.
itself defined at Nuremburg as Crimes against Peace, or War
Crimes.
Will you commit to fully support investigations into the White
House's false claims justifying the invasion
of Iraq, and would you support impeachment of Bush, Cheney and
other administration officials for these
and other high crimes?
I believe in Rule by Law. No one is unaccountable, or above the
law.
Congress'
failure to uphold the rule of law, to uphold its sworn oath, is a
danger to the rule of Law. The founders and framers of the
Constitution could foresee a need for Congressional oversight and
accountability, and saw fit to discuss impeachment in six places
in that document. (Curiously, "corporation" appears
nowhere.)
I
would support investigations to the actions of any government
officials, whether in foreign countries, or
my own, which may constitute War Crimes, or at the least, the
fraud perpetrated and described in the book "
USA
v. George W Bush" by
Elizabeth de la Vega
. If investigations
proved to be grounds for
impeachment of either President Bush, or Vice President, it is
Congress' obligation pursue the.
It is
appalling that throughout two full Congressional sessions,
particularly after the November 2006 election's majority went to
the Democrats that many members of Congress have failed to support
HR 333, which I would do, if in office.
Have you participated
in or spoken at any events, demonstrations, meetings or teach-ins
opposing the
Iraq
war and occupation?
Yes. I have participated in a
number of anti-war and impeachment demonstrations on the street.
Have you organized any such
events?
I am organizing 24 (or 48) hour anti-war vigil in downtown
San Diego
, in solidarity with Iraq Veterans
Against the War and their Winter Soldier events, March 14-15.
2)
Health Care:
There
are over 46 million uninsured people living in
America
, the majority of who are working Americans. Every year, nearly
18,000 people die unnecessarily as a direct result of their lack
of health insurance. Millions
with health insurance maintain inadequate, overly expensive
coverage and face the peril of denials of claims or termination of
benefits if a family member becomes seriously ill--one of the
leading causes of bankruptcy in the
U.S.
While spending twice
as much on health care as any other industrialized country,
our system performs poorly, spending more money for less coverage,
maximizing profits by finding ways to deny care. The private
insurance bureaucracy expends one-third of health care money on
waste, administrative paperwork, advertising and corporate
profits. The current
Medicare program for senior citizens spends under 4% of
its budget for its overhead costs. Meanwhile, poor health,
escalating health insurance premiums and spiraling health care
costs impair our economy and job creation in the
U.S.
PDA has endorsed HR 676, the
National Health /"Expanded and Improved Medicare
for-All" Act. To guarantee comprehensive health care for all,
PDA supports the replacement of the current profit-driven system,
publicly financed, privately provided health care program. This
"Medicare for All" national plan would save more than
$350 billion per year, enough new money to provide guaranteed
comprehensive
health care for all. This system would insure portable and uniform
benefits regardless of income. With no deductibles or co-pays,
this plan would encourage preventive care and restore a doctor and
patient
controlled health care system affording choice of providers and
fair, publicly negotiated payment for both treatment and
medication.
What is your approach to the health
care crisis?
I believe that without
access to health care, we cannot reasonably practice the pursuit
of "life, liberty and happiness" – as exhorted to in
the Declaration of Independence.
It is a moral outrage that the
United
States
has 46 million who are without access to healthcare, and
approximately 100 million who are un- or inadequately covered.
We
are all the stakeholders in the Public Health. I would support
legislation similar to HR 676, the Conyers-Kucinich bill, the
system endorsed by more than 14,000 physicians.
What
is your view of Guaranteed Health Care through an Expanded and
Improved Medicare-for-All
system?
See above. If
France
can put together a functioning healthcare system for its
population, there is no
reason that the
United States
cannot.
There will be certain parties who will howl in anger at such a
system, best illustrated by CEOs such as UnitedHealthcare's
William McGuire, who, after years in the private sector of
healthcare, then attempted
to retire with $1.3 billion in gains, and Pfizer's former CEO Hank
McKinnell, former BusinessRoundTable Chairman, who, after pushing
pharmaceuticals on the market that medical plans neither needed
nor could afford, stepped down with $240 million in options.
A for-profit system tends to fall victim to being
rigged
in the interests of a self-serving elite.
These enormous healthcare and Pharma CEO payouts illustrate
at
a glance that for-profit systems are difficult to harness to the
public good.
If
elected, would you support a publicly financed, privately provided
national health care program, which insures access to
comprehensive health care for all in the
U.S.
?
Yes. Americans deserve
access to at least a minimum of health care, particularly
preventive care. I have worked with type II diabetics and am very
concerned about the epidemics of diabetes, obesity,
hypertension, and cardiac disease which are lurking like time
bombs in our population. As
the son of a physician who works in a
County
Hospital
, we often do not realize that failure to treat and intervene
early
is not a "savings" but rather a cost, a tax that must be
paid elsewhere.
Would
you support a not-for-profit, doctor-patient controlled system
which would eliminate the private health insurance industry (with
protection for eliminated workers) as the intermediary determining
access and the level of care?
Yes, substantially.
When we create a profit-center out of denying care to those
who need it, to feed the corporate insurance sector's requirement
to "make its numbers" on profit margins each year, we
sow the seeds of disaster. It
is care-givers and patients that have the vested interest in
promoting long-term public health – and that "health and
wellness" is to the public profit – measured in moral
terms, not in Wall
Street's dollar-only metric.
Would
you support the government's ability to negotiate fair prices for
treatment as well as drugs, as it
does for those covered by the Veteran's Administration's plan?
Yes. I furthermore
would support intensive engagement of the FDA in its mission not
to rubber-stamp Big Pharma's latest new drugs, but to determine
efficacy and safety. Our government is useless if it does not
protect the public from such harms as the recent phen-fen and
Vioxx debacles. My work in analyzing
clinical trials data from big-Pharma sponsored drug trials (both
the published and often-hidden data) has
been invaluable.
3)
Economic Justice:
The
current generation has seen unprecedented levels of economic
disparity, both among individuals (the richest 1% of Americans own
almost 35% of all wealth; the bottom half, only 2.5%) and in the
ratio of
CEO pay to employee wages. Thirty-seven million people (equal to
the population of
California
) are living
in poverty in the
U.S.
These immoral levels of poverty, which disproportionately impact
communities of
color and women, can be significantly reduced through concerned
legislative effort - including a living wage for all workers,
expanded earned income tax credits, childcare assistance and
housing vouchers.
Specifically, the federal government must fulfill its
promise of resources to Hurricane Katrina survivors so they can
return to rebuild their communities
in the
Gulf
Coast
.
Tax
burdens on the middle class can be eased if the wealthy pay their
share. In addition to working to roll back Bush's tax breaks for
the wealthy, PDA endorses the Equity in Income Act, limiting the
amount of
CEO compensation afforded federal corporate tax deductions. In
emphatically supporting the workers'
right to organize, we also endorse the Employee Free Choice Act,
which establishes unions in any
workplace where a majority of workers sign union cards to join. In
the global arena, PDA supports anti-sweatshop legislation and fair
trade agreements which protect workers' rights as well as the
environment, while opposing wage reducing "free trade"
agreements that protect only corporate rights to exploit
unprotected labor. PDA
also advocates for humane and comprehensive immigration reform,
which insures a fair, attainable path to citizenship and the
rights of undocumented workers in the workplace, affirming the
dignity and integrity of immigrant families.
What is your position on "Fair Trade"
versus "Free Trade" agreements?
"Free Trade"
agreements often prove to be neither Free nor substantially about
furthering true Trade, rather a rigging of the system to the
benefit of the few, and detriment of many.
If 12 years of NAFTA
have not shown anything else, the ability of US Corn to dump a
subsidized product on Central American markets has the net effect
of driving Central American growers (many smallholders) off their
own land,
into the ranks of urban poor, and finally, to desperate migrations
to other countries.
This
massive migration pressure is felt first in border areas including
San Diego
County
. NAFTA and its
ilk (such as the recent Peru-CAFTA) have failed all parties.
I am strongly supportive of fair wages being paid on both
sides of the border, and to these ends, trade agreements not by
supra-national bodies such as the WTO, but from representation of
workers and the citizens, are of utmost importance to all.
Will you have pledge to reverse
the tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans?
I pledge to restore tax
fairness, and to do this, the repeal of the
economically-disastrous Bush tax cuts is essential -- (Even
conservative Alan Greenspan, former head of the Federal Reserve,
insists on that point.)
Having
already thought about the matter, I would support a “Tobin
Tax” on financial derivative transactions (the outstanding
notional amount is roughly $516 trillion) of about 0.5% to 1%.
Congress must act now to restore fairness, such that Wall
Street transactions of billions and trillions are taxed in a
fashion not
creating unfairness to the laboring man and woman.
Do you support the right of
workers to organize, in any situation?
I support the right of workers
to organize, to discuss organization, and if a majority agree to
form a labor organization, then management should immediately
begin a formal process that acknowledges and formally recognizes
this process, while creating protections for workers who wish to
organize.
What is your relationship to
labor nationally and in your district?
I am in support of Organized Labor, nationally –and I believe
that to be pro-Labor is to be pro-Family and furthermore
pro-strong American Middle Class. A strong an engaged middle class
is a bulwark of liberty, and of the "domestic
tranquility" referred to in the Constitution.
I work on behalf of a plaintiffs’ firm which represents
Union clients in securities fraud class-action suits, when union
pension funds have
been
defrauded -- these unions include SEIU, UNITE-HERE, and others.
Do you have union endorsements and
supporters in your district?
I have no union endorsements at this time. I will seek the
endorsement of particular labor unions in the
53rd District.
What is your approach to
bringing communities "out of poverty"?
1)
Recognize the root causes of the poverty cycle in a
specific community, and
address them with long-range programs
2)
Business incentive and job creation: most
communities on borderline poverty are ready and willing
to work. They lack the job training & access to capital --
which the wealthy often enjoy as a matter
of birthright.
3)
Homeownership & foreclosure:
I support public & private partnerships in the
community which assist at-risk homeowners who face late payment or
mortgage default. The 2/28 and 3/27 ARM mortgages (called
“subprime”) often result in rapidly increasing “balloon
payments.” Default leads to foreclosure leads to neighborhood
decay I support neighborhood which assist at-risk homeowners from
predatory lending, and can save homeowners from foreclosure –
programs in
Chicago
have
been incredibly successful in this regard.
Would you support the
legislation of the "out of poverty" caucus?
Yes.
Poverty is an issue addressed through equitable and mandatory
education standards, through investment in human capital across
the country, and requires equitable taxation and healthcare
support to achieve the goal. We all stand to gain if poverty is
addressed honestly, and with moral force.
What efforts would you
support to provide meaningful resources to Katrina survivors?
In 2005 and 2006, the
United States government missed, (whether through negligence or by
intention) an
incredibly important opportunity in the aftermath of the flooding
and destruction of many lower Wards in
New Orleans– to bring job skills and educational training to the
poor communities of the Lower 9th Ward
and elsewhere. Instead, the Federal Government sent FEMA trailers
with toxic formaldehyde.
This does nothing to alleviate either acute or long-term
issues. Out of
crisis, opportunity:
New Orleans
residents,
for example, could be right now working with groups like Rebuild
Green to construct affordable and environmentally-sound housing in
their own neighborhoods, “Green Collar” jobs.
Frequently all we need
but do is “open the door” – and it is morally appalling that
our government does not.
Do you support
comprehensive and humane immigration reform as outlined above?
I
do.
Have you reached out to
immigrant communities and advocates in your district?
I have established alliances with advocates who work for
justice and represent groups of different ethnic identities.
4) Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections:
The
U.S.
election system is in crisis.
Not only are the usual corrupting factors of money and
corporate lobbying as rampant as perhaps at any time in U.S.
history, but the new millennium along with the fallout from the
contested 2000 election - have ushered in a qualitative change in
the conduct of our elections: Centuries of tradition in which
citizens, government officials and Party representatives oversaw
physical evidence of voter intent have fallen to the rise of the
machines. This sea change, from paper to ephemeral electrons,
brings much more than the implicit demand to trust the invisible:
the move to computers means that 85% of
America
has ceded control of its elections to third-party vendors, whose
legal claims regarding proprietary software bring corporate
control of the entire voting process. PDA thus supports federal
legislation that would ban the use of touch-screen (“DRE”)
voting machines.
Will you pledge, if elected, to
support only voting methods in which ballots are cast on paper?
The ballot of record must be defined not as the computer
coordinates of the vote record, but the Paper Ballot.
I have been a long time advocate of auditable, verifiable
elections, whether via hand-counted paper ballots at the Precinct,
or other verifiable, auditable method, consistently employing
Paper Ballots.
I will lead the fight in Congress not for compromise solutions,
but for simple and clear legislative reform – and I believe that
it is imperative to restore Voter Trust and Confidence in our
election systems. The well-documented irregularities of the
elections of 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2006 demonstrate that vote
suppression, and computerized tabulation, represent "clear
and present dangers" to fair, transparent, and open
democracy.
Do you pledge to
support “Clean Money” public financing of public elections?
Yes.
“Clean Money” is part of important three-part reforms
1)
sweeping campaign finance reform
(no bundling, lowered maximum individual contributions,
matching public funds)
2)
verifiable voting aka “paper ballots” (no computerized
tabulation)
3)
fair redistricting, to end gerrymandering of absurd districts
which are purely designed to promote incumbency.
All
three areas require immediate action.
Would you accept public
financing for your current campaign?
Yes – particularly upon demonstrating support within the
community for my candidacy.
Do you support the restoration
of voting rights to past felony offenders?
Yes.
Do you support same-day
voting registration?
Absolutely.
Would you oppose the
onerous requirement of official photo identification before
affording citizens access
to the polls?
I oppose ID requirements at
the polls.
Photo
and “REAL-ID” requirements are designed to suppress voting
among elderly and ethnic groups.
5) Environment/ Global Warming:
No
issue reveals more clearly the flaws of the
U.S.
political-economic system than global warming - the dominance of
greed and corporate power over the public good, and the
nearsighted focus on the short-term over the welfare of
future generations. It
is known that the U.S. has the natural resources to power the
entire country solely from clean, “alternative” sources of
power- whether with solar cells that would require a
miniscule fraction of the California
desert, or from wind turbines on the Great Plains and in the Great
Lakes. It has also
often been said that we need a
new Apollo Program for clean energy (if not Manhattan Project), in
which science, industry and government would cooperate on a crash
course to produce novel results in a limited period. Immediate
action would include raising the
auto fuel economy and impose mandatory caps on carbon pollution
while investing in public transportation, energy conservation
technologies and alternative energy development--in the process,
creating new jobs, which pay well.
PDA calls on the Democratic majority
in Congress to lead boldly in reducing our country's oil
dependence and use of fossil fuels.
Will you pledge to take an
uncompromising leadership role on legislation to enact the
enormous changes
and sacrifices that will be required to stem Global Warming?
Yes.
I
plan to be in the vanguard of this legislation. Although
sustainable energy and climate policy is often
seen as “bad for business”
-- it is more apparent that it is merely “bad for
ExxonMobil and Big Oil.”
There are incredibly exciting job creation possibilities, “green
collar” jobs, which we will implement in
San Diego
County
area, and show the rest of the country (and doubters) that the
transition to sustainable
energy solutions will actually drive economic growth.
Will you pledge to enact an
Apollo Program for clean energy?
I will fight to enact
the “Apollo
Alliance
” for renewable and sustainable energy. It all starts with
simple
and useful conservation measures.
What kind of personal
vehicle do you currently drive? Is it rated ZEV, or PZEV?
My primary personal transportation is generally a shared
carpool. (I don’t
know how that rates on ZEV scale)
My summer & fall transportation is frequently a
bicycle, and public transportation for the rest.
During 2007, I challenged myself to reduce personal
gasoline consumption by 50%, which I met, as well as 20% reduction
in electricity, natural gas, and water.
It proved very possible with creative solutions. In
Congress, I will champion national legislation that turns the same
practical solutions into public policy.
Local Issue:
Blackwater has initiated the
establishment a training camp in
Potrero
CA
. Congressman Bob
Filner has come out in full opposition to this camp.
What
will you do specifically to support him in keeping Blackwater out
of
San Diego
County
?
I will Stand Up with Bob Filner. All too frequently, the other
Democratic Representative in
San Diego
county fails to stand up and speak out to the moral imperatives of
our County, as Democrats, and as
human beings.
I
will fight for legislation, proposed by Filner and others, that
bans the use of any land, public or private, for private military
contractors (PMCs) such as Blackwater, DynCorp, Kroll, or others.
Private mercenary armies are inimical to freedom, much as
Madison and others recognized in the late 1700s.
What is your position
on using military contractors in our military actions abroad?
This is a very bad idea.
The
possibility arises that 1) private contractors are hired on a
different pay scale, which is unfair to our troops 2) private
contractors would be asked to perform task which escape the Geneva
Conventions and oversight bodies including Congress and 3) that
someday, somewhere, a contingent of private mercenaries might
massacre innocent people at an intersection.
If
Congress does not act forcefully to assert its oversight
authority, such things could someday come to
pass, and I would predict that the private companies involved
would attempt to use some legal loophole to escape accountability.
In our cities, such as
New Orleans
?
Strongly opposed.
Blackwater is the for-hire equivalent of the Brownshirts in
Germany
of the 1930s.
I
recall that a for-hire mercenary in
New Orleans
related this story about encountering, and then gunning down
Americans: [The
private security contractor] said he and his men were armed with
AR-15s and
Glocks and that they unleashed a barrage of bullets in the general
direction of the alleged shooters on the overpass. "After
that, all I heard was moaning and screaming, and the shooting
stopped. That was it.
Enough said."
On our border?
We can decide how to protect,
police or defend our borders according to public law, and
employing men and women who are accountable to publi